Loss?

Oglaf is awesome!

Not all men are neoliberals

Lunduke mentioned, fundamentally unserious.

I think this would’ve aorked better w/o the text

:3

AI bros literally trying to create the Antichrist

I can second that

Even taken charitably I feel like this person fundamentally does not understand what a trans woman is…

Like… (And you can figure this out by talking to trans gals) they’re women.

I don’t even know why, but it seems to me that there’s way too many people out there who seem to think that being into women means you gotta be into all of them. And that the women they don’t like are somehow lesser as women.

This is also a frequent talking point made against the legitimacy of trans women.

And I mean, it’s pretty clear how a somewhat egocentric and more essentialist worldview with a strong belief in traditional gender dynamics would lead you there.

I’ve not had issues with ublock

Yooo

Literally me

I wish I was that confident about my sexuality

yeah, top-left is regular multiplication. Top-center actjally is the so-called alternating product (basically the correct way of defining the cross product).

Top-right is supposed to be the operation in a gtoup.

There’s no explicit cartesian product here but the middle one is the tensor product. The tensor prodict of sets (in so far as that statement makes sense) is the cartesian product.

:)

Totally, set theory is deep dark magic and tbh set theorists kinda scare me. Like they’ll gleefully introduce incredibly complicated objects with very little intuition about them

You know the top left one. They teach that in schools.

I mean… Ideal theory of rings? (Smth like (5) ∪ (7))

Pretty sure this is not AI, you can literally download the krita files on the website

Set theory is relatively lawful.