Answer: Idaho introduced term limits to all state offices after a 1994 winning ballot measure introduced them. Then, in 2002 the State Leglislature struck down the proposition and removed all such term limits from the State’s government.

Unless the Neolibs claim that Idaho is a dictatorship, I have owned them by their own logic and surely they will have no choice but to admit that they were wrong?

So many leftists have internalized the Liberal myth of Trotsky (he’s just like Snowball from the farm animal book!!!), and in contrarianism now have an equally inaccurate view of the man. One formed almost entirely by memes, with no examination of his actual actions, and thought.

Like yeah, the guy who: led the Red army in the Russian Civil War, and supported the Chinese Communists when the Party (including Stalin) backed the Kuomintang) must’ve just been a huge Lib all that time.

Read “The Revolution Betrayed”, its good and Trotsky’s has only been vindicated in his belief that the USSR would fall as a result of a Capitalistic restoration led by the Bureaucracy.

Just because some shitty parties call themselves “Trotskyist” doesn’t mean the man was bad, Euro-Communism was led by shitty parties who called themselves Marxist.

As someone who used to identify as one; calling yourself a “Libertarian Marxist” is the stupidest shit.

To label yourself a Marxist is to imply that you have adopted Marx’s scientific method of socio-economic analysis, Historical Materialism.

If you believe that Marx was a Libertarian, the term “Libertarian Marxist” would be redundant.

If you believe that Marx was too “authoritarian”, “Libertarian Marxist” would be an oxymoron.

The term is a contradiction, which is why the only people who call themselves Libertarian Marxists today are Liberals who wish to adopt the aesthetics of radicalism; but are unable to escape from Bourgeoise propaganda surrounding actually existing Marxist revolutions, and Marxist States.