• 5 Posts
  • 787 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle






  • When I need to trial in peace, I spam Stella Montis raids focusing on Medical Research and lobby I bring literally no loadout or just a ferro 1 and some ammo. I focus on gathering blueprints and can’t shoot back anyway. In 3/4 raids like that you should have very friendly lobbies.

    May you trials go smoothly!

    Time to craft some seeker grenades for those rocketeer’s!

    Also I think there is a special blueprint that drops on hidden bunker but maybe I’m confusing it to locked gate. Is it the bobcat blueprint?




  • OK, i agree that party size should count on the decision but i also understand that this is suppose to evaluate the aggressiveness of a player. Since you play very differently solo and trio you probably assume everybody does.

    There is some truth IMO on saying that many aggressive players will be just the same irrelevant of party size. The more chill solo is something that appeared organically because people wanted at least one safe space. But it’s not really a rule or anything official. I personally wish I could play trios in a more peaceful manner so I agree the change you suggest might help. But also people that are aggressive will often be on any modes anyway. I find hard to believe the extract campers in trios would suddenly be any different when they play solo…

    Also in trios the matchmaking has to assess the aggressiveness of three players and find and adequate lobby with other similarly aggressive teams. So it’s not as simple as having three hidden MMR aggressiveness because I think people tend to naturally be more aggressive in groups. So a group of mildly aggressive players can be a very aggressive group when they free loadout on stella montis ;)







  • Tetsuo@jlai.lutoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldPeople like this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    My instance of choice decided to unilaterally and without any warning whatsoever disable downvotes. Just to “try it out”.

    I’m still pissed about it to this day.

    I mean that google removes any kind of downvotes is one stupid thing, but that people think this makes content “better” is crazy to me.

    Now I do understand that in small communities the weight of a super negative account can be quite an issue… But is removing completely any negative feedback the solution ? Really, it’s all we got ?

    Also the simple fact that a lot of this community is from Reddit, IMO it’s not okay to disable a feature like that without even voting on it.

    So if you think disabling negative feedback fixes an issue, you have the burden to prove or at least explain the reasoning.

    I do think it didn’t make YouTube any less of a cesspool to disable downvotes on it…

    Edit : Also while votes are not supposed to replace moderation, they certainly help limiting the reach of spammers. Like if the mods are asleep at least the community can bury the post in the meantime. But no, they just disabled downvotes and made a post about the change the same day. Wtf.


  • I would say it doesn’t exactly say that AI is bad moreso that shoving it forcefully in people’s throat is not the way to do it.

    If all the BS AI of Windows would be exclusively opt-in I would be “” fine"" with it.

    Then there is also the “telemetry” and the random updates, or settings changing on their own and…