Definitely a chemtrail, specifically phenolphthalein.

They were most likely testing the pH effects of their prior chemtrail operation (those fake clouds). The Pink color indicates that the area is basic as opposed to the atmospheres usual acidic state, under acidic conditions it would be colorless.

Edit: down votes already rolling in from the group of gangstalkers they have on my case smh. I will not be silenced!

I think you have a very different perspective from me on what OP was asking and what this thread is.

Indeed it seems so. I read it more as

OP: “I believe porn can ruin your mind and sex habits, how do we acknowledge this without delving into conservatism on the issue.”

You: “wtf porn doesn’t ruin your life, you’re in a rabbit hole and your entire premise is wrong”

Me: “Porn can ruin your life, why would you suggest it can’t? Look at gooners”

…

I feel you have to actually understand and acknowledge the real potential effects of pornography in order to find the line between recognition of harmful effects and conservatism.

This wasn’t the Democrats being failed

Correct.

it was the whole country being failed

Exactly, by the Democrats.

It wasn’t about voting for the Democrats

Hence why people didn’t vote for Democrats. They had no reason.

and there was only one way to effectively do that.

Do you think it was about voting democrats. You just think they should be able to do literally whatever they want, including genocide.

they’re just posting memes about how everyone didn’t push back against the democrats hard enough

More like they’re posting about how the Democrats should have listened when we were posting the same things before ethe election, but you not only willfully ignored us, you distanced yourself. Now that it over and we were right, you’re mad at the messenger.

“this idea…”, you mean your idea?

Nobody said that peasants lived under broadly better societal and material conditions. You’re arguing with yourself.

I didn’t say you invent those phrases, I said that you harshly dismissed them with no recognition of the limited truth they hold, so why would you expect me to know you recognize the nuance?

How can I “put some ridiculous binary statement” in your mouth when I’m just reacting to the binary you already presented.

It like if someone says " all drugs are bad because they ruin your life".

and you say “wtf that’s not true, drugs don’t ruin your life” without mentioning that you’re only talking about some drugs.

Obviously I’m going to point out that, no, drugs can ruin your life if you partake in them the wrong way, because drug addicts do have a problem and you dismissed it through ignoring it, even if that’s not your intention. I can’t know your hidden intentions, only what you post.

Porn wrecks your mind?

Porn stops your sexuality? Wtf.

you shouldn’t assume even your starting framework is agreed upon

Why wonder about people who think porn stunts their sexuality (still wtf?!?)

You mentioned it multiple times but the only things you said about these statements were harshly dismissive and didn’t provide any sort of nuance so why would it be ridiculous for me to respond as if there wasn’t nuance in your opinion? I don’t know what’s in your heart/mind, only what you say.

Are you arguing gooners don’t have a problem?

Many people become addicted to pornography and yes it can wreck your mind and regular sex drive/habits just as any addiction can.

No. I’m not attracted to men (the same excuse I tell my mirror!).

I’d probably go into a training montage of… everything. Who better to hone your skills against than yourself?

When you go in strike

But only for one day, rather than holding out until you get your demands, so the next day the boss just tells you to do double the work or your fired. (you’re no longer protected by the very few strike breaking laws as the strike is over)

Isn’t blue sky made by the same people who made Twitter?

It makes sense that people who are leaving twitter because of Elons changes are nostalgic and see that the old Twitter people made a new one so they jump in. Basically name recognition.

(I have only used Twitter)

Henry said the province was still identifying the exact strain, but assumes the case is H5N1.

The World Health Organization says H5N1’s risk to humans is low because there is no evidence of human transmission, but the virus has been found in an increasing number of animals including cattle in the United States.

We’re really just gonna re-run a Trump pandemic

:

They’re the guiding light.

The red sun in the sky.

You get high asf and remain a responsible adult.

I get high asf to turn into a responsible adult.

We are not the same.

Yes, they made some good points in the video.

I hadn’t watched the video yet and was just commenting on the general discussions you mention in the title.

I thought about coming back to specify that they had gotten that right but I was lazy and figured there was no real reason to.

Instead I learned how to post

Missed opportunity to release Skyrim 2 on 02/22/2022.

Idk how to word this properly, but the “they will/won’t learn from this” argument is flawed on its face imo as it takes for granted that the Democratic parties primary mission is in any way aligned with ours to start with. It’s not.

The lesson they will learn is the same one they learn every election, what they’re doing works.

The Democratic party would rather lose to Republicans than give anything to leftists because they agree with Republicans policies and disagree with leftists policies.

Every year that they keep leftism at bay, it’s a successful year.

Saudi Arabia of all nations finally waking up?

This is a good sign.

Not that I think they will do anything, but their willingness to speak up so bluntly tells me that either

1. they recognize the faults in US hegemony in the region so are willing to create just a little more distance.

Or

2. the US itself recognizes the loss of hegemony and are allowing small expressions in the hope they “blow off steam”.

Their decision to mention Iran in a positive way at all makes me think it might be option 1.