• 0 Posts
  • 2.06K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle


  • It’s also a testament to Altman’s dealmaking prowess: a progressive San Francisco tech leader walked into an administration that opposed everything he publicly stood for, and within days, he secured a crown.

    Bullshit. Absolute steaming mountains of bullshit.

    These techbros don’t stand for anything. They’re a bunch of objectivist libertarian assholes who enjoy the aesthetics of being perceived as progressive because it’s trendy in the kind of social spaces they want to inhabit.

    This isn’t about “dealmaking skills”, it’s about Trump being a giant baby who will do anything for anyone who kisses his ass, and Altman not giving a flying fuck about Trump being a fascist because sucking up to him makes him money.


  • Even the great depression was, itself, an entirely artificial crisis.

    I’m not saying that it occurred artificially; the causes were all real, and happened naturally.

    But if you consider for even a moment the idea that a stock market crash leads to widespread starvation, it doesn’t make the slightest bit of sense.

    Times of hardship used to be caused by things like droughts or harsh winters; stuff that actually impacted our ability to support ourselves in a physical way.

    But how does someone’s investments failing prevent a farm from growing food? Does crop fertility track with the Dow-Jones? Does soil become less tillable because the FTSE is down?

    The idea that people should starve, in a world that has no less ability to produce crops than it did yesterday, just because there is suddenly less money moving around, is absolute lunacy. In a sensible world, we’d think less about money and more about resources. Resources do not depend on the stock market. Resources do not become more scarce because a bunch of people made bad bets on the housing market.

    No one should starve in a world with the capacity to feed everyone. And we have more than the capacity to feed everyone.


  • I both love and hate comments like this (and say that having made more than a few of them myself). It’s great to see people sharing advice on how to cook better, do more for yourself, do more at home, etc. I really enjoy making my own pickles, baking bread, making home made stock from scraps.

    On the other hand, it disgusts me that comments like this are necessary. It’s the twenty first century, humanity has built flying machines, travelled into space and harnessed the power of the atom, and we’re out here sharing basic survival advice with each in the hopes of making it through one more day. Shouldn’t our basic standard of living be better than that of hunter-gatherers by now?





  • We had to put my dog on a course of antibiotics recently, and my wife was fretting over how we were going to convince her to eat them. We had all sorts of ideas like crushing then up in peanut butter, but I said “Hey, before we try any of that, let’s just put them in her food bowl and see what happens.”

    Turns out the little idiot will eat literally anything you put in front of her, including medications. She’ll go back and specifically lick the tablets up out of the bowl if she somehow missed them.










  • My guess is that it’s set up to see contexts with conflicting positions associated as controversial but it will just go with responses that don’t have controversy associated with them.

    This is significantly more reasoning and analysis than LLMs are capable of.

    When they give those “I can’t respond to that” replies, it’s because a specific programmed keyword filter was tripped, forcing the model to insert a pre-programmed response instead. The rest of the time, they’re just regurgitating a melange of the most statically present text on the subject from their training data.