Chronically depressed, chronically online.

Socialist discordian statist for open science, independent journalism and gay crime.

Other accounts:

Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world

Icytrees@sh.itjust.works

  • 67 Posts
  • 95 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: November 4th, 2025

help-circle
  • Wren@lemmy.todaytoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldReally is simple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 minutes ago
    1. Do not. The person you’re arguing with is saying a pedophile is not a rapist, never said it was fine, and you’re arguing with them.

    2-3. See point 1.

    1. Actually, the way we use the term Fetish colloquially is how the term Paraphelia is used is psychology. A non-con fetish is a paraphelia. The reason I used ‘non-con’ is because, like pedophelia, it can be redirected in legal forms of sexual expression.

    What’s concerning is calling everything you don’t like or don’t understand concerning, and hinting that people arguing with you are pedophiles.

    Again, you argued with someone who tried to point out pedophelia doesn’t make someone a rapist. You brought up the nature of a fantasy as a point of argument, which I responded to.

    Your entire last paragraph is ridiculous.



  • Lots of people have non-con fetishes. Doesn’t make them rapists. Hell, who hasn’t thought about murdering someone, or robbing a bank?

    Good fucking thing we don’t punish thought crimes.

    Pedophelia is a paraphelia that requires treatment to manage/mitigate/overcome. Many people with pedophelia were young rape victims, themselves.

    If we can all agree:

    1. People don’t choose to have pedophelia, and,

    2. We would like to have less people with pedophelia,

    Then we can also agree there should be easy to access treatments for pedophelia.

    People trying to destigmatize the paraphelia and promote access to treatment are doing a lot more to make the world better than the ones calling every pedophile a rapist, even if they never act on it.










  • The article begins with a history of communication and condemnation over differing values, so the author definitely doesn’t say this only applies to the internet. The article just happens to be about the internet.

    She doesn’t say to never debate with strangers, either. That whole section was the bookend to her starting primer on violence over ideological differences, the point was that people are more than just a single comment on the internet.

    She only mentions bluesky once. The article brings up, multiple times, the underlying motivators keeping people angry and engaged.

    One example:

    So, which institutions are we being tempted to condemn root-and-branch because of some mistakes and abuses? What large, trying-to-be-helpful-but-sometimes-failing associations would various rulers like to break up and destroy because they represent alternative sources of authority to their own narrative, and also there’s money to be made?

    I don’t even know where to start with the Palestinian genocide thing. Where did that come from? This is more about individual experience with the internet.



















  • Yeah, and I just like the texture more. Sometimes I rice up parsnips with the quinoa for a pretty interesting texture/flavor. You can follow sushi rice recipes to prep it. I don’t cook the parsnips.

    For filling I matchstick any combo of carrots, cucumbers, SPINACH, beets, peppers, whatever, and let 'em marinate in a tiny splish splash of tamari and sesame oil. Add avocado when rolling. Meat is optional but encouraged, if that’s your thing.





  • Wren@lemmy.todaytoNews@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m not going to validate my right to be compassionate by proving I’ve known shit people and had shit experiences.

    More to the point, I believe you’re referring to sociopathy and psychopathy when you talk about a lack of empathy, but that’s old science. Newer research shows improvement, especially with early intervention, in treatment of antisocial personality disorders. Psychiatric treatment of comorbities shows overall improvement in symptoms. And, recent studies on ASPD in neuroscience reveal that cognitive empathy isn’t a sliding scale, it’s a gamut, and it’s not even consistent within an individual. So IF someone has ASPD and we’re not just going to kill them, the best option is still evidence-based care.

    It’s difficult to diagnose cognitive empathy disorders at a young age, but it’s possible the kid has a conduct disorder — which, along with ASPD, almost certainly has genetic groundwork but is strongly tied to early cognitive development (how he was raised,) and family history.

    Regardless of what he has or where he came from, restorative justice is still more effective across the board socially and economically. I think of the worst people I’ve ever known when I consider my view of justice, and I still believe in restorative measures. I’m not only compassionate because I have empathy, but because evidence shows corporal punishment increases recidivism, exacerbates and often causes mental health disorders, and is ultimately an expensive monolith to an outdated belief in justice that isn’t based in fact.

    Do I want every lying, cheating, violent piece of shit to face justice? Hell yeah I do. But I want that justice to be JUST and actually fix society instead of taking the bad and making them worse.