If there weer to be an ‘about us’ section to explain what the project is and where it came from, that would let people understand that you are not trying to impersonate the ‘creators’.

Perhaps including reto in the network section would be a sign of good faith.

Generally I believe reproducible binaries should be the standard method.

It’s interesting that you mention ofrnxmr. I’ve noticed a lot of community members having a very negative experience with him.

Can someone explain what is going on, or link to something? This all seems sketchy, almost like a hijacking of the project, but I’m guessing not as there is talk of a CCS.

Also, why is the only network listed aloha? why not reto, which tbh thought was the only one.

A very sad day indeed

sounds interesting, thanks

saw your stickers on the day, nice work

Well i guess you could argue that there is the ‘Third-Party Apps & Services Update’ in the periodical #4. I was thinking along those lines. It’s been said before, ‘many people are unknowingly taking part in the counter economy’, maybe some links to articles or things that may open up their mind to idea that the counter economy is and can be an organized movement.

how about some more counter-economics ‘news’ mixed in?

out of interest… do localmonero have editorial input?

I dont frequent the IRC channels so i’m curious about the speculation

thanks for the info, link edited

F

probably just the picture from the bitinfo charts site

No point in saying sorry, then being rude. You want to talk about the real world, but then your write like that… that made me laugh.

Your title reads; ‘dedicated to monero lovers and cypherpunks!’. You should rather write ‘dedicated to male monero lovers and male cypherpunks!’ as it would be more accurate. Don’t make yourself a liar. Idc what ‘service’ you create or what you call it. I was giving you some insight, which you clearly lacked

what’s that supposed to mean?

As a female, i would never start using something called monerobros. Good luck with that tho