I’ve just tried it out on “All” and basically the entire first page is filled with one user’s posts to !visualarts@lemmy.dbzer0.com :/

As a Wikipedia editor I can comfirm - we regularly say that napalm sticking to objects in water is POV. I do it at least twice a week. I’ll try making a bot to do it automatically so I’ll have more time for holocaust denial.

You can check old versions of any article by clicking ‘history’. And yeah, the standards used to be pretty low.

That’s certainly one of the takes of all time.

Hmm, how do you treat your Roomba?

The weak field South Atlantic Anomaly was first identified southeast of South America back in the 19th century.

How?? Wikipedia says it was discovered in 1958…

That’s assuming today’s standards for a film’s financial success are the same as in the early 80s. Were they?

Ukraine can help him solving that problem.

It’s funny how you’re coming up with a barrage of excuses for every possible option, even ignoring Hasan’s own statements. Why are you defending him from the claim that he used a shock collar if he literally said it’s not a shock collar at all? If the sped up video is not proof that the dog was kept in one single place the entire time, why defend the idea that the dog was kept there for hours on end? If the dog wasn’t forced to be there, why was Hasan angry at it for walking out?

You’re really not interested in the truth yourself - you’re not trying to explain the video itself, judging the likelihood of this and that explanation against each other, it’s just about finding every explanation that excuses Hasan, no matter how nonsensical. That’s also why you ignored my question (Let’s assume that he did shock the dog, what evidence would you require beyond the clip?) - you can’t even theoretically imagine something that could convince you he did shock the dog.

Personally, I have a mild dislike for streamers in general (Hasan not particularly standing out among them), it’s a weird and evidently socially unhealthy phenomenon, but in this case I’d probably forget about the situation within a day if I didn’t see so much aggressive, vitriolic and gaslight-y defending of the guy from his fans.

is actually pretty common and I think you already know that, it’s called time-out and it’s also commonly used with small children and nobody with a working brain calls that abusive either

“Time out” for hours on end - that would veer into abusiveness.

Pointing out obvious stuff captured on video being described as “psychotic” is pretty random in my book, just throwing insults around. Nothing cryptic? So what’s my “favourite subreddit” then? Because I’m still wondering. And it is definitely incoherent on your part, considering you claim I’m terminally online, after I posted a total of two comments ITT and yourself currently having no fewer than 38 comments.

The “potentially responsible use case” for a training collar is training, fucking duh

So what is he training the dog to do?

Nobody here has presented any evidence yet for 4 continuous hours, I’ve seen a 56 second clip

The clip is the crux of the evidence. The time lapse is just to contextualise how much the dog has moved. Let’s assume that he did shock the dog, what evidence would you require beyond the clip?

I don’t find spammers’ random cryptic fantasies about me to be obvious. Neither does your comment seem to actually relate to the above one, other than displaying a similar type of incoherent verbal aggression.

What the absolute fuck are you talking about?

So, um, why is Hasan angry at the dog then? And why is he 100% unbothered by the dog clearly being in pain for one reason or another?

there’s absolutely nothing inherently abusive about those when used responsibly either

“It didn’t happen, but if it did they deserved it anyway” ass excuse. What is this potentially responsible usage in this case? Forcing the dog to stay in the exact same spot for four hours of the stream because it’s a cute prop?

Polish vs Czech :D

These can be lots of fun in Slavic languages. Croatian “ponos” = pride, but Russian “ponos” = diarrhea.

Why would investors care about whether he’s bullshitting either, if he’s making them money? They just have to sell before it all tanks.

I didn’t use to read the texts too carefully when playing, so idk, I don’t remember it. But Wikipedia agrees with you, so I guess that’s how it is.

Come to think of it, even if they missed the narrative motivation, they would still have to count it as woke because it has female crew members who are just as efficient and strong as male ones. I shit you not, that was their complaint regarding Age of Empires 2 and 3…

Not Woke: FTL, where the main goal is to defeat an organization of violent racist facists.

Ehh, I’ve played the game a fair bit over the years and haven’t noticed that detail

Yeah, but anyone can click on the links to the more detailed explanations, which are even more unhinged.