• 5 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle






  • dewittlebooktoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldChristian roulette
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, there is at least one point that makes this make sense and maybe a second if I am reading it correctly. Would you care to hear it out? Or would you not be interested in hearing more? (Hopefully I remember to check back here. I have 0 clue what not-google google has to say about this tbh)


  • I think we can agree that Nazi’s are not something we want to assocuate with. Help me understand, what would you do? How would you limit the service to prioritize[s] privacy in order to protect human rights defenders, journalists, and everyday users who value their privacy but then also filter out Nazi’s? How would this be different from TOR?



  • If she’s arguing for … crap then she should probably stick to Science.

    tldr/w: I probably should’ve only doe this bit here and on her being a physicist versus a science communicator

    Humorously enough, she also has a video for that Basically she talks about:

    • Why “doing your own research” should be poked at

    * Topics she doesn’t have a PhD in and has been told she shouldn’t talk about

    * On being a physicist versus a science communicator

    • Main video points
      1. When not to do your own research (When there isn’t enough research) 2.(?) Reasonable expectations (Why she doesn’t talk about UFO’s, a plug for support to do a video on ‘Experts’, limits of Google/internet, what is relevant for understanding? )
      2. Be honest with yourself (Acknowledge what you dont understand, erroneous mental short cut example)
    1. Acknowledge biases

    Rest of video not as relevant to your point

    Do your own research. But do it right. [Video] Now where’s that bot at…?