These people boast about EU being a democratic heaven whenever they get criticized for their complicity with crimes against humanity. Then they fuck every democratic principle and mechanism to do whatever their lobbyist ask them to do.

So you are equaling being pro-Hamas to procuring weapons to a genocidal entity?? hmmm

I’m of the opinion that they did nothing wrong and the trial itself is criminal to begin with. I still don’t understand their or your comment, what’s at the bottom of the slope?

what does this even mean? The German judicial system is putting obstacles to have a fair trail against people doing their best to boycott a genocide and this is what you have to say about it?

I’m reading a lot of “no progress at all” headlines by many analist: Magyar is pro-zionist, pro-war, right-leaning politician with no regard for the feminist movements or the rights of the LGBTI community. The only interesting “change” is that it aligns with Von Der Leyen-Kallas views, and thats why mainstream media is foaming at the mouth with it.

Yes that was my confusion, that’s also why not all countries are present in this vote. The original post is trying to raise attention because the vote for the Chat Control 2.0 is starting these days.

My bad, I thought I had included the link to the original post when I uploaded the image

According to this other post by Tuta:

Final negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 just started between the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the EU. What is good: ✅️ Encryption will not be broken What is bad: ❌️ Commission & Council want #IDchecks