![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Conspiracy theories must be quite common for people that don’t know what could means.
Conspiracy theories must be quite common for people that don’t know what could means.
There are but the most likely one is you not knowing what could means.
It is, but it’s far more likely you missed or didn’t understand the word could.
That’s why I used the word could. In this context it’s used to express possibility.
Nothing in the article discusses the legitimacy of the subscriptions. It could simply be a way money was funneled.
Your fact check article you cited has been updated with corrections.
The headline of this piece has been updated to more accurately describe the contents of the fact check. While Politico LLC did receive funds from USAID and other government agencies, the money was not for grants but payment for subscriptions to its publications. Also, the $8.2 million figure cited refers to payments in the 12 months leading up to February 2025, not dating back to 2016.
I’m advocating for use of proper statistics not for either side.
Favoritism is getting calls that you shouldn’t get, not the number of calls you get. Playing more undisciplined teams could easily influence the numbers.
To identify a bias trend you need to look at calls against over average, ie do the Chiefs get more calls over a particular opponents average. Even this can be misleading as it’s a measure of penalties not bad call penalties and the sample size is not large enough.
Chiefs average 6.1 penalties against per game.
Let’s look at the Chiefs opponents.
Ravens average 8.3 pen against per game they had 7 Chiefs 6. Chiefs -1
Bengals 5.8 Average, had 8 against chiefs had 4. Chiefs +4.
Atlanta 5.8 average, game was 6 & 6 l. Chiefs 0.
Chargers 5.8 average, game 9 & 5. Chiefs +4.
Saints 6.5 average, game 5 & 6. Chiefs -1.5
49ers 6.5 average, game 6 & 4. Chiefs +1.5.
Raiders 5.6 average, game 5 & 8. Chiefs -2.5
Bucs 6.8 average, game 5 & 4. Chiefs +0.
Broncos 6.5, game 6 & 3. Chiefs +2.5.
Bills 7.4, game 3 & 6. Chiefs -4.5.
Panthers 6.9, game 9 & 10. Chiefs -2.
Raiders 5.6, game 9 & 7. Chiefs +4.5.
Chargers 5.8, game 7 & 8. Chiefs +3.
Browns 6.9, game 6 & 4. Chiefs +0.
Texans 7.9, game 6 & 2. Chiefs +2.
Steelers 6.4, game 4 & 9. Chiefs -0.5.
Broncos 6.5, game 5 & 3. Chiefs +1.5
Texans 7.9, game 8 & 5. Chiefs +2.
Bills 7.4, game 6 & 5. Chiefs -0.5.
Chiefs are +12.5 penalties above average which indicates they may be getting more calls than they should.
Penalties accepted is not a metric for determining favorable calls. Quit pretending your skewed facts are somehow better than anyone else’s.
A first down on a stalled drive from a bogus call has the same impact as a turn over. Turnovers are a huge indicator of success in the NFL.
I have enjoyed being a “numbered sheep” thanks for asking. I have a nice house, cars & wonderful family, I’m living the American dream. Hopefully you can find enjoyment from life too.
If they arrived at elis island they immigrated here legally.
The problem with using cameras is an accuracy limitation, the problem is similar to VAR where a person’s interpretation of one pixel is the difference. On top of that the camera in an F1 car is vibrating.
Some officials having access revoked on some systems is an active coup?
Her exact words were
such a consequential President of the United States, a Mount Rushmore kind of President
You have Teddy Roosevelt up there and he’s wonderful. I don’t say take him down. But you can add Biden
It’s just Republicans trolling after Nancy pants said Joe should be on Mount Rushmore.
Maybe it’s the cynic in me but all I can see is some asshole with a selfie stick talking over the press secretary.
How many people do you think watch football for the announcers? Announcers don’t make or break ratings, if they did Joe Buck would be gone a long time ago.
I understand that media companies are beholden to F1 teams for access but the loss is the transparency of a steward explaining their decision.
Since you seemed to miss it the first time.
https://lemm.ee/post/53270418/17727028
Let’s see if you can provide a source that the judge was intimidated by Trump.
Based on your actions I don’t think you know what squabble means either.
Further USAID was not investigating starlink. They don’t have authority to investigate starlink. They were investigating how the Government of Ukraine used the USAID-provided Starlink terminals & how USAID monitored the Government of Ukraine’s use of USAID-provided Starlink terminals.
Finally Starlink was never turned off for Ukraine they denied access up to Crimea because of US sanctions on Russia.