Unless they get trump and Vance at once it’s not necessarily Johnson. Vance would pick a new VP that is then next in line.

Like Bob Loblaw? What’s he done besides lob law bombs on his law blog?

J/k. And pretty sure Scott Baio is a shitstain too.

It’s not about it working. It’s about creating a narrative in their own head where they are the victim even if it’s a complete fabrication. Then they can pin all their recent troubles on something that isn’t their fault. “That asshole gave me a thumbs up, then went back on it! I needed that thing for success, and he’s the reason that didn’t happen.”

Hans, are we the baddies?

He was caught Reich-handed.

Good gods that’s a great line.

TBI?

Fuck me in the ass cause I love Jesus!

If they manage this we should then point to the census whenever they whine about “illegals” since there wouldn’t be any. Kinda like when Herr Trumpler wanted to stop testing for covid.

And Fetterman. Surprised they didn’t include Hillary.

Perfect for the GOP

Pretty sure we had “The Information Age”. Seems trivial to call this “The Misinformation Age”.

Man, youre getting really worked up over this. Reminds me of a certain single letter conspiracy theorist group.

I’m not saying anything. I’m telling you what the military does. I also alluded to you that I’m not qualified to make those decisions myself. Your beef is not with me.

No. But you’re crying to us because they didn’t. Suck it the fuck up and actually do a little research yourself. “Trust but verify.”

Diabetes is generally disqualifying in the military. Whether it should be or not is beyond my expertise to make an informed opinion.

It’s not that video’s job to provide that counter. That’s yours. This isn’t being published in a scientific journal or something. It’s a YouTube video.

The rationale I was told was for battlefield risks. If they are on hormone treatments, there’s a risk if they are unable to obtain those while deployed somewhere. Also similar to how the military handles diabetics.

No idea how reasonable or accurate that is. I’m not a doctor.

Ad hominem non sequitur? You’re going places.

That’s like saying a prosecutor should also present the defense. It’s not their job. That’s yours. You need to judge how accurate the information is and find ways to verify it. Qs blindly accept any information their side presents without any attempt to critically assess its validity. They also ignore contrary information with similar effort. It’s what makes them so dangerous. A bad actor on “their side” can manipulate them simply by speaking. A good actor on the “other side” could be 100% factual with ample sourcing and citing and will never convince them of the truth.

Not unless his vote killed it. They all talked in the backroom. This was merely a signal to trump.