Sounds pretty great to me honestly… Might spin up vm this weekend and give it a shot!

Thought let’s be honest, I’ve grown kinda lazy in my old age and compiling kernels is kinda a pain if you don’t need to so I dont know if I’ll actually use it for anything

Yeah I’ve had foil bags with dessicant be damp too. In my experience, if you’re getting a deal on petg you probably need to dry it. That’s probably why you got the deal.

I do too. I kinda miss Jenkins but a lot of the conveniences in GitLab’s CI are really nice and it’s better for 99% of use cases.

Yeah seeing the original I suspected retraction settings since it was mostly in places with lots of retractions.and long paths even out and look smooth.

This fixed the under extrusion which seems to confirm it’s a retraction problem but disabling it entirely you’ve got those oozing artifacts where moves happen.

I’d suggest using a small value for your retraction and probably take the time to use teaching tech or ellis’ tunning guides to tune your retraction settings.

Every other ci in existence you just write a command. Then if it doesn’t work you run the command on your machine and fix it.

Actions are “magic” which means you have to fake the ci runner with tools and reverse engineer the action to run local debugging and if it failed you might not even fully know what was running with digging into the actions source.

GitHub provides you the tools and their “easy” until they aren’t.

It’s very Microsoft though. It feels like trying to write a Windows app and trying to get your random Net environment definition to line everything up and compile in VS then hoping the same thing happens when you deploy.

“Russia has nothing to do with Greenland and US has nothing to do with Ukraine. Right comrade?”

Oh…I was interested until you said actions. What a terrible system for ci.

How many administrations have we been doing the unelected billionaire who bought the ability to run the government approval numbers? I’d like to see the trend numbers on that.

Technically it’s not browser tolerance but spec tolerance. It’s built into the html5 spec to tolerate different tags closing and other things invalid in xml.

This was an important design that grew out of one of the largest failings of xhtml that such failures would make the entire page unrenderable.

I was being sarcastic because really it doesn’t have a tool with explicit features, just a workaround using a couple features together.

For a new user it’s very difficult to do a pretty basic task.

It does! And it’s so easy to use.

• Draw a circle with the ellipse selection tool
• From the edit menu choose “stroke selection” and follow the dialogs
• Remove your selection

It’s so obvious I can’t imagine why anyone would be confused.

Canada can just become the 51st state and solve that /s

This article is pretty terrible and I’m not a fan of Apple but honestly he’s taken a pretty measured approach and the fact that their product is garbage isn’t his fault so much as the hype train being off course.

If anything people should be thankful he didn’t waste more money, but right now the measurement isn’t how successful your business is or how good your product is but how much money you flushed down the toilet chasing the dream of “AI”. Because this is a bubble not a revolution.

Yeah but now instead of using highly specialized language models to extract calendar information and explicitly create an appointment, it now uses a generalized model that gets it wrong more often than not. So it’s better (for investors).

Firefox main problem with profitability relevance. They need more people to get people to use their tools

So I just have two questions.

1. How does this get new users?
2. How does this help retention?

The only answer is it doesn’t and we don’t care because we’re going to cash out.

I’m not running away, I’ll still open Firefox tomorrow like yesterday because the browser landscape is terrible and the shadow of what Firefox was is still good.

But I’m looking for the disruptor because as questionable as a lot of the new smaller browsers are, there are people out there trying and it’s going to happen.

Cool.

And the best part is, if I set it to never I get the websites I was actually looking for.

Right? That’s pretty obviously the entire point of the first amendment right? Anyone?

It’s so semantic it almost reads like a sentence!

And who needs simplicity when you can teach people about advanced shell techniques like command substitution?

Perfection.

Between the fact I’ve been using a date picker for ages in Firefox, the fact dates and times are hard, and the title of the issue that’s clearly a zombie issue. I’m surprised they were able to close it at all.

I mean yes but also credited as the inspiration to start YouTube so also the same as it ever was?