Imagine how wildly irresponsible a national project would be though. Every time it switched to Republican hands they’d start sabotaging it, and then claiming government is inefficient.

There have been so many corners it’s now a circle

They also pay taxes but don’t receive benefits. It’s a terrible idea to send them away.

Powerful! Everyone should give this a watch

One thing that’s so weird to me is that while DeepSeek is somewhat too large to run on my PC, just it existing makes it easy to distill the reasoning functionality into other smaller models. I’ve been running a 34B distill locally and it’s been much better than any other local model I’ve tried so far.

92% left to go, I guess

Yeah because their mission got promoted to be part of the next crew rotation. They’re not stranded, they’re doing their jobs.

The hell are you talking about? It’s right there in the article. But maybe you didn’t read it?

Ad hominem attacks like you are using are a sign you don’t have anything useful to say.

Stupid users send private keys and other secrets to their AIs all the time. This is a big fucking threat to US global imperialism.

The US trusts OpenAI (even if they shouldn’t) to not send hackers after US companies. They definitely don’t trust Chinese companies to have the same restraints.

Nah, I’m speaking from the perspective of the US, since the article is about US policy. The decision making is obvious when you’re thinking at a national protectionist level.

Obviously privacy violations are bad for the user regardless. Never trust your corporations or government!

Well yeah, it’s obviously more of a risk to send directly to your rival than internally. Both are risky but one is much, much worse.

Not really, on virtually any poll with enough people, something like 10-20% of people will always be contrarian, no matter the question. You could ask if kicking puppies is evil and 15% would answer “it’s okay sometimes, as a treat”.

with a folding knife and two molotov cocktails

Silly assassin, in America we use GUNS.

Fair enough, it’s not source code, so open source doesn’t apply.

Training code created by the community always pops up shortly after release. It has happened for every major model so far. Additionally you have never needed the original training dataset to continue training a model.

No, but I do call a CC licensed png file open source even if the author didn’t share the original layered Photoshop file.

Model weights are data, not code.

It’s just AI haters trying to find any way to disparage AI. They’re trying to be “holier than thou”.

The model weights are data, not code. It’s perfectly fine to call it open source even though you don’t have the means to reproduce the data from scratch. You are allowed to modify and distribute said modifications so it’s functionally free (as in freedom) anyway.

Do remember that Nazis were alive and well in the United States all the way up to the time it entered WWII. Only then did it become fashionable to hide the fact one sympathized with Nazis.

It literally takes war or great civil unrest to push back fascism for a time.

Right, the offline version (if you have the hardware to run it) is completely under your control, and no one can take that away from you. Honestly nice to see that happen, I thought it would take several years.

Man that trailer shows like 3 or 4 wildly inconsistent art styles in the game. What’s going on?