• 1.69K Posts
  • 1.95K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle











  • I’m not sure I understand your substantive question very well.

    There already is a bridge from RSS feeds to ActivityPub: https://rss-parrot.net/ (there are plenty of sources I follow through that).

    The clue of what ActivityPub is for is in the name: it is for publishing one’s activities. For example “I’ve written a new blog post”, “I’ve commented on someone else’s activity”, “I’ve upvoted someone else’s comment”.

    RSS is really just a structured format to describe the content of a website in simpler terms. It doesn’t ever send any information to anyone, it doesn’t have any mechanism for anyone else to interact.

    I used to follow news sites directly through an RSS reader. But I would need to set that up separately on each device, including after reinstalling, which I just can’t be bothered to do. I know there are things like Feedly, but not everyone likes proprietary services and software that much. I like the fact that on Mastodon nowadays, I can follow both microbloggers and RSS feeds.














  • That’s the Guy Incognito scene: Homer had been banned from Moe’s bar, we see someone resembling Homer walking into Moe’s bar, introducing himself as Guy Incognito, Moe believes that this is Homer in disguise and violently removes him from the bar again. A few seconds later, Homer walks by and notices that Guy Incognito resembles him very much, only to be immediately distracted by the dog with the puffy tail in the OP’s image.

    I’m less sure about the broader episode, but I think it may be that later Homer pretends to be a pilot in order to drink in a pilots’ bar, is put in a cockpit and makes a mistake there, and as an apology, the Simpsons get free plane tickets and that way it’s discovered that Marge has a fear of flying and this (incl. her going to a psychologist) is what the remaining episode is about. If I’m correct about this, I think the episode is called “Fear of Flying” or very similar.










  • oh for fuck’s sake

    It’s a legally still unsettled question in most jurisdictions whether AI crawling and training requires permission from the copyright holders of the source works at all. If the answer to that question is “no”, then the entire idea of wanting to use copyright law (and copyright licenses) to block AI crawling and training doesn’t work at all.

    I do not think we should want the answer to that question to be “yes”. Why would anyone want copyright law to impose more restrictions than it does anyway? The trend should be toward fewer copyright restrictions.

    I am not at all a fan of the current AI hype, but I am even less of a fan of wanting copyright law to be more restrictive or to be construed that way.