It was mostly a joke/irony.
Git is already a “distributed version control system” that does exactly what I’ve described. On the other hand, relying on centralized systems such as GitHub means that the “distributed” nature of it doesn’t make it any more resilient to failure.
I wonder if it would be effective at blocking its own ads… 🤔
Based on these ads, I do not trust the site anyway.
Love the concept, though.
But I crave starches and saturated fats.
Would be cool to see those as extensions to Git. Surely they could just be more Git objects?
Stands to reason that one domestic terror organization would recruit from another.
What we need is some sort of distributed version control system.
I’m not quite sure how it will work yet, but it would have the entire codebase and its history mirrored onto every developer’s computer. Instead of requiring a central repository, developers could share their changes directly with each other.
Just abroad? What about domestically?
I find it’s the GUI tools that are usually cryptic, especially when you want to do more than the most basic operations.
This is why electric cars are not the answer. We still need to reduce our dependency on them and replace with public transit, micromobility and walking where possible.
Policy seems fair as long as they return all non-European artifacts to their homes.
Ya, the west would never do such a thing!
Best I can do is El Salvador.
They start off by saying their PieFed instance was down.
But then you used the template with mismatched colours?
I guess they’re still at the “concept of a plan” stage.