

What I find ludicrous about this supposed consensus, is that the singular exalted evidence cited is a very small passage, acquired third-hand, which differs from the conventional story, from a source that isn’t necessarily proven reliable, who doesn’t state his own sources, and which was written 80 years after Jesus’ presumed death, and was actually cataloging a period about 30 years after his death, and only mentions him in passing.
Shit, there’s Elvis sightings with better evidence.

qv: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Jesus