More DEI, Less DUI!

If that dude got proper support, he could have done wonders; he made animated icons for his 16-color assembly-coded OS, and a simple 3d racer! All by himself!

She was lied to. She can join us. Big Tent Energy.

The attention to detail is nice

There’s a Fairly Odd Parents episode where Timmy wishes for this, and his asshole neighbors still found themselves to be the best of the grey blobs

The joke is that he’s so callous he would give dysphoria to someone likely cis, using cyborg technology, all because of road rage.

They sent people to the jungle without shelter. Do you really think they plan to meet all of their needs? And if they are just doing their best to cope with the migrants, then the US is responsible for sending them to a place that could not handle them.

It’s not a separate issue at all, these people would not be in Panama at all if the US had followed its own laws, and these camps would not exist.

The US is calling the shots, you admitted they might not be following the law, and yet you expect the US to follow the rules they create and break? That’s a very niave outlook on global politics.

They are both places in which the government keeps people, exposed to the elements, only barely meeting their material needs, with the idea that such an arrangement is temporary.

Tell me, what differences between these camps and the Panama ones matter in a practical sense? The side of the border the detanees were born on?

Not with men inherently, but a plurality of men act a common way such that it’s worth examining.

I know this from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

I’m guessing OP means the build quality, as defined by the mechanical and material standards that are needed to recreate the keyboard.

I ate an onion ring for the glory of the empire

The first sentence on Wikipedia identifies his as a scam artist lol

Putting aside the cringe, why is this common amongst specifically boomers? Why are men the ones that enjoy quiet? Was it how boomer men were raised to expect their partner to be, or conditioning from spending all day at their job, likely socializing?

Her accomplishments are erased from public record, making it hard to prove she worked where she worked and affected her career.

It does if both parties are referring to a different noun

By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.

The words you use are good, but the context is bad.

This is not “a” person, this is a specific person who has perpetuated a corporate policy that directly affects the livelyhood of its medical customers. Many customers died because they were denied care, as a result of said corporate policy.

This assassination did get me a positive result. Were I to go into surgery, I am garuteed anesthetics for the full surgery, even if it goes into overtime. This is due to United reversing a decision they made before the shooting. It was only through Brian Thompsan’s death that the company made this decision, as they have a reputation for denying care they are responsible for giving.

The only legal recourse would be lawsuits. This does not work, as corporations of United’s size pay fines as if they were taxes - the fines don’t get the intended result.

Are you against all violence, or unnecessary violence? History has many examples of necessary violence as a means of protecting one’s home or life. Violence is often inevitable, as desperate people become commonplace. And since there is no line dividing functional and dysfunctional societies, one must use their own judgment to determine if using violence will get them the change they want, and if that change is worthwhile.

Even if you aren’t desperate, good luck explaining to the growing homeless how legal reform works better than insurrection, when they could easily steal to meet their need for food. The desperate don’t think long term, since humans prioritize immediate food and shelter over abstract economic stability. And since fewer housed people can afford retirement, their ability to believe in a stable future for themselves wanes.

Rule of law has not worked to fix the system, and material abundance does not help the sick and injured who are being scammed out of their savings for the promise of living.

I agree with you that killing defensless people in the street is wrong. I also do not see this specific murder as wrong, and am prepared to defend that opinion from the standpoint of reducing the totality of human suffering. I would not perform such murder, but I would not assist the police.

If you think I’m evil, so be it, but pearl-clutching does nothing but waste bandwidth, so give your best effort to convince people that your view is correct.