So LibDems then.

I agree it’s about power, and people get hopped up on feeling that power.

However, please stay the fuck away from any protests. You’re likely to get other people killed brandishing guns whether they are loaded or not.

How many missile defence systems do you own?

You can find something interesting without needing to own it.

Interesting how OP talked about him killed with your his weapon, and you spun it around to you killing someone else.

Which do you think is more likely if you get in a bar brawl?

Termiteater

Not Termineater

I think he’s already full of vinegar.

It was fine when rendering (esp. text) was server side and not client side like it is now. At least LAN (10MB ethernet) was basically transparent. Internet was shit mainly because everyone was on 56k modems.

GTK and Qt do all their rendering client side and transfer bitmaps to the server requiring much more bandwidth.

No. Welcome to people thinking that their vote doesn’t matter unless they’re “on the winning team”. The system allows anyone to win. The psychology of the electorate is locked into two party politics.

You know theatre existed, right? That was the predominate medium for fiction before the explosion of published literature in the 18th/19th century. Publishing became a business. Big business. Some of the richest people around were publishers. “Financial ghouls” filtering what was produced.

Film/TV is the dominant narrative art form of our age. Print was the dominant narrative art form in that time. Hence my comparison.

Take this example for instance:

fn doMath(x: anytype) @TypeOf(x) {
  // …
}

There is no way to know what that function requires as input.

Of course you can’t know. That function has no requirements. As such there’s only one thing it can do… return x. Anything else is making an assumption about the parameter being passed.

The thing that really grinds my gears is that at the next election people still won’t consider parties like the lib dems or greens that actually want to bring in social policies.

“Down with anti-corruption. Support corruption. Vote BJP”

When we see “tested under laboratory conditions”, we often assume real-world conditions will lead to faster degradation of a product.

Why would you assume that? You’re going to test a range of things, but you’re likely most interested in the best and worst case. Lab conditions just means consistent conditions.

It’s a text editor you customise by programming it. Why do you think that’s appealing?

Not watching TV and Film is the equivalent of saying “I don’t read” in the Victorian era. Good fiction explores the human condition. It poses questions to the reader / viewer to consider. It uses alternative settings to reframe real world events and forces you to re-evaluate things from different perspectives. It can break you out of rutted thinking.

Now there’s an awful lot of shit out there too, but not watching Schindler’s List because Love Island is crap is ludicrous.

I thought TrumpCoin was the sovereign’s wealth fund.

I’m sure they’d be fine with a few old windmills.

Solar farms don’t stop you using the land for farming completely. Panels don’t have to stop all light, and elevated panels can still have some type of plants grow under them. Grazing animals along side solar farms is apparently quite successful. They serve as shelter from strong sun and rain, and the grasses are fine.

“Monstrous Pylons” standing next to a model of a 1950s design.

This is what they look like now.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-60754357

Thank you, that was exactly my intension.

However, I think that comment is already dead.