

I agree with the sentiment of trying to ease the cost of housing.
But… building shitty little barely houses, just so the cost of bigger property can justify staying high, isn’t the way forward. Housing needs to be made affordable to people again, and it needs to do that by property prices coming closer to peoples income. If we get there and people are happy with small cheap housing, then great.
I’m seeing similar with holidays. In the 1990s going on a family holiday somewhere abroad and enjoying it wasn’t uncommon. Now we’re glamorising staying in a shed, in some farmers field, with no running water. “Off grid, shepherds hut” my arse, we’re being conditioned that a shite holiday that we can barely afford is a step up.
I don’t want to go back to the waste of before, the masses of international travel and burned cheap fuel. But … we need to call a spade a spade here. Selling cheap, at high prices is just more ripping people off, and leaving people in emotional austerity is damaging to wellness and social being.








I’d like to see more of a breakdown.
The stats on helmets etc. are interesting, but they only tell a part of the story.
The issue with these things being illegal, is the decent people who follow common sense rules and safety stay away. Because they’re illegal. This means the only people who are riding them, are assholes or asshole related. By definition. They’re already breaking the illegal rule, just by using the device. They are not likely to be people who will wear helmets, or be people who will honour (or teach their sprogs to honour) highway code or any other code of common sense. So of course, the accident to user ratio is quite high. Decent users, are not users at all.
I agree with other commenters, these can/could/should be positive devices. Allowing all electric “green” transportation in a tiny footprint. This would work, if we had the cycle/safe-space infrastructure to allow it and if we had a population that would enforce a level of common sense safety.