The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agoNo.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1960arrow-down125
arrow-up1935arrow-down1imageNo.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squarefsxylo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·7 months agoI always assumed it was news as plural. Here’s a list of new’s. This is new, that is new.
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·7 months agoIt’s not only okay not to pluralize with an apostrophe, ever, but as a bonus it makes what you wrote into English.
minus-squareDillyDaily@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 months agoI’m pretty sure this is the actual etymology of news. People asking each other “what new things?” becomes “what news”, as well as usage like “that information is new to me” becoming “that is news to me”
minus-squareLengAwaits@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 months agoMight as well call it Olds then, these days, considering how repetitious it all is.
minus-squarekelargo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoThat automobile manufacturer disappeared.
I always assumed it was news as plural. Here’s a list of new’s. This is new, that is new.
It’s not only okay not to pluralize with an apostrophe, ever, but as a bonus it makes what you wrote into English.
I’m pretty sure this is the actual etymology of news.
People asking each other “what new things?” becomes “what news”, as well as usage like “that information is new to me” becoming “that is news to me”
Might as well call it Olds then, these days, considering how repetitious it all is.
Hello fellow old
That automobile manufacturer disappeared.
It is, and I hate it