renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 个月前AI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down122cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 个月前message-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·9 个月前We were using XML for that before JSON.
minus-squareschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down6·9 个月前Yes and it is a good thing we don’t anymore.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·9 个月前Why? JSON hasn’t given us anything XML hasn’t, except maybe a bit of terseness. I do agree SOAP is a bit over engineered, though, but that’s not the fault of XML.
minus-squareexu@feditown.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 个月前XML is much more annoying to read/write by hand
minus-square0xD@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 个月前As a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.
We were using XML for that before JSON.
Yes and it is a good thing we don’t anymore.
Why? JSON hasn’t given us anything XML hasn’t, except maybe a bit of terseness.
I do agree SOAP is a bit over engineered, though, but that’s not the fault of XML.
XML is much more annoying to read/write by hand
As a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.