doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net to games@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months agoNintendo's suing Palworld (for real this time)www.nintendo.co.jpexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down12cross-posted to: nintendo@lemmy.worldgames@lemmy.worldgames@sh.itjust.worksgames@lemmy.world
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkNintendo's suing Palworld (for real this time)www.nintendo.co.jpdoublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net to games@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square77fedilinkcross-posted to: nintendo@lemmy.worldgames@lemmy.worldgames@sh.itjust.worksgames@lemmy.world
minus-squareKoboldKomrade [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·8 months agoJoke lawsuit. The only valid response is a to any lawyer or judge who decides to waste time arbitrating whether or not a soulless husk can own a concept.
minus-squaregay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-28 months ago“We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.” is the correct response from palworld here
Joke lawsuit. The only valid response is a
to any lawyer or judge who decides to waste time arbitrating whether or not a soulless husk can own a concept.
“We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.” is the correct response from palworld here