I notice you have no qualms about treating other sentient animals as “mere meat”? Now that is “dehumanization” on an industrial scale… Like I said, you’re the sort of evil person who abided slavery for 10,000 years.
Human beings are literally animals. Fucking moron. There is no trait that you can attribute to all humans that doesn’t also apply to many if not most animals.
The first is biological and concerns speciation (statistical distributions of genetic material).
The second is normative, concerning transcendental traits, such as sentience and empathy; it has nothing to do with genes.
“Dehumanization” is a normative concept, not a biological one, by definition. There is nothing special about being a particular species of animal, such as a homo sapien, but there is something special about consciousness and the capacity to suffer. To pretend otherwise is precisely to dehumanize, you evil moron.
They should eat each other. It’s the only ethical choice.
Promoting plants 69ing is so 2024.
Actually the ethical choice would be to eat people who defend carnivory since they’re evil anyway and their lives don’t matter.
The ethical choice is dehumanization.
You are definitely the sane person here
deleted by creator
I notice you have no qualms about treating other sentient animals as “mere meat”? Now that is “dehumanization” on an industrial scale… Like I said, you’re the sort of evil person who abided slavery for 10,000 years.
they’re literally not human
Human beings are literally animals. Fucking moron. There is no trait that you can attribute to all humans that doesn’t also apply to many if not most animals.
you can’t dehumanize nonhumans
There are two senses of the word “human.”
“Dehumanization” is a normative concept, not a biological one, by definition. There is nothing special about being a particular species of animal, such as a homo sapien, but there is something special about consciousness and the capacity to suffer. To pretend otherwise is precisely to dehumanize, you evil moron.
non humans cannot be dehumanized. it is tautological.