threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Don't Dead - Open Inside@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish · 7 months agoWORK NOT HARD SMARTsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down11
arrow-up1120arrow-down1imageWORK NOT HARD SMARTsh.itjust.worksthreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Don't Dead - Open Inside@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareNaich@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·7 months agoIt’s either “work not hard smart” or “work hard not smart”. Either way it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·7 months agoYou’re supposed to read pink, then red, basically like an x… incredibly confusing.
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·7 months agoEven then it doesn’t work:“work smart hard not”
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·7 months agoIt does, if you read it like this: 1 3 4 2 I.e.: like no one ever read anything
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-27 months agoWhat you mean. do I read like that. everything
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoAt least they got the top left correct. Don’t work hard indeed.
It’s either “work not hard smart” or “work hard not smart”. Either way it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
You’re supposed to read pink, then red, basically like an x… incredibly confusing.
Even then it doesn’t work:“work smart hard not”
It does, if you read it like this:
I.e.: like no one ever read anything
What you
mean. do
I read like
that. everything
At least they got the top left correct.
Don’t work hard indeed.