cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6501985 > I have been considering
the obvious organizations such as FRSO or PSL. However, an article really made
some points that stood out to me: > >
https://cosmonautmag.com/2018/10/from-workers-party-to-workers-republic-2/ > >
>“What made the “Leninist party of a new type” different was not democratic
centralism. Rather than simple centralism, Comintern parties had a form of
‘monolithism’ to use the phrase of Fernando Claudin.14 In other words, Comintern
parties emphasized centralism over democracy or often just disregarded
democratic norms entirely. While this wasn’t absent in the Second International,
the Third was born as a sort of militarized civil war organization rather than a
political party in the sense of a mass workers association as envisioned by
Marx. While this may have been justified at a time when an actual global civil
war against capitalism was on the table, this is not the case right now – we are
not living in the same era of ‘Wars and Revolutions’ as the leaders of the
Comintern were. When modern Leninists claim the secret of their parties’ road to
success is ‘democratic centralism’, it tends to mean an overly bureaucratized
group that puts heavy workloads on individual members to make them more
‘disciplined’, and a lack of actual democracy in favor of a more militarized
party structure. Factions are forbidden, ideological centralism (rather than
programmatic centralism) is imposed from above, and groups aim to build an
‘elite’ cadre that tails existing mass struggles, hoping to bank in on them to
recruit members. The Comintern model is simply a recipe for failure in today’s
conditions, just another guide to building yet another sect that will compete
for the latest batch of recruits. How this actually works in practice is
exemplified by the state of actually existing contemporary Leninism in the USA.
> > > >Take PSL, FRSO-FB and the ISO as case studies. Alongside schemes to take
over union bureaucracy, these organizations essentially form front groups that
hide affiliation to any kind of communist goals and aim to mobilize students
around the latest liberal social justice issues and work in alliance with NGOs
to throw rallies of mostly symbolic value. Through these activities, the cadre
(or inner group) of the Leninist organization hopes to recruit parts of the
liberal activist community in order to grow their base of support and garner
more influence in these social movements. The organizations themselves proclaim
democratic centralism, but in reality, there is no public debate about party
positions allowed between congresses. At the congresses debate, takes place as
little as possible and is usually led by an unelected central committee that
composed of full-time staffer careerists. By using their “militant minority”
tactics to act as the “spark that lights the prairie fire” in popular struggles,
the modern Leninists (with some exceptions of course) tend to tail these
struggles instead of fight for a class-conscious approach to issues of civil and
democratic rights. One tactic often used is to hand out as many of their signs
as possible to appear larger in number, when in reality this is often protesting
street theater backed by NGOs connected to the Democrats who are simply using
leftists as useful idiots for “direct actions” against the Republicans. Usually,
the rationale for this activism is to raise consciousness among liberals.
Theoretically, by ‘riding the wave’ of spontaneous activism, the militant
minority group will build up enough influence to launch an insurrection. This is
a delusional hope. It leads to chronic involvement in activism that takes up
time and energy but doesn’t build working class institutions that can actually
offer concrete gains for working people through collective action. One could
describe this general strategy of tailing social movements as ‘movementism’.” >
> I have definitely observed this within FRSO's seeding of cadre in "front"
"mass" organizations such as New SDS, anti-war groups, or various NAARPR
chapters to recruit other cadre. > > There is also a strange divide and turf war
between otherwise similar programmatic unity between PSL, FRSO, and WWP. Like,
UNITE! > > Open to feedback and thoughts, need to talk it out with other
comrades.
I’m writing this as a response to the linked thread and realized it should be it’s own post.
I’ll be brief: My DSA chapter is in the planning stages of what we will focus on next year. We are a smaller chapter so we are working to pick programs that we can realistically do with a handful of people.
I read a lot on here about how orgs such as this one are doing everything wrong… so is there a step-by-step guide to doing the “right” thing?
Potential programs we may pursue next year (these are being put up to a vote in a few weeks):
A internal membership development program. Lots of political education including a reading group for the new translation of Capital Vol. 1
An agitprop program. We will teach each other how to work Canva/GIMP, design flyers, posters and other media and start being more outgoing around the area with our advertising.
A “mass line” project where we plan to hold community “listening sessions” in the more impoverished parts of town.
A Crisis Pregnancy Center awareness campaign. We would point out these centers around town, agitate against them through awareness campaigns and maybe lobby to get them banned in our area?
Take everything I say with a grain of salt because I don’t know much about your org or who is in it.
The first thing I would do is take a step back and ask why you are predetermining a year’s worth of organizing if it is not already more or less consensus. This might have the smell of being overly focused on committees and decisions when what is really needed is research, self-reflection, or just building a program organically.
I’m going to ask a bunch of questions. You don’t need to personally answer them by any means but they are the kinds of questions I would suggest thinking about.
Does your chapter already have any campaigns?
Are they going well?
Are they represented in this list? If not, why not?
Are there opportunities to grow or modify those campaigns?
What worked well last year and what had room for improvement?
Are you working in any coalitions? If so, have you talked to them about strategic planning for the next year and identified any projects? If not, could you identify organizations with which you’d like to work in coalition?
Do any of these proposed focuses have planning documents and committees? Timelines, bottom liners, budgets, goals? Any opportunities to help your members gain leadership and organizing skills?
Do you plan on recruiting? If so, what will “new recruits” do? Do you have a political education pipeline and people to lead it? How do you handle and/or minimize toxicity or harmful liberalism?
Okay so for the four listed items:
I think political education is usually a good idea and even better if you can tie it to action of some kind. Can you think of a way in which a local project could be informed or framed by a Marxist perspective? Or maybe just ask that question during the reading session. The best way to prevent reading groups from only being reading groups is to use them to forward a practical goal.
I think an agitprop program would be infinitely better if there were specific campaigns for which to make agitprop. The “agit” part of agitprop is for agitation. For what are you agitating and why? If this is something that someone has particular interest in I would not shoot them down, but I would help with grounding it in a campaign or two.
I would 100% scrap this. Instead, you should do research and practical projects in that part of town (which will also lead to insights) so that you can identify a better project. A mass line requires already being embedded with that population, knowing how to gain trust, having that trust, and pulling in a strategic direction. Do you have members from that part of town? Do they have strong community ties already? Think about how you could authentically create trust and ties. Think of reasons you should be present in that community and how you could support it. And rely on gathering real-world experience to answer that question.
A Crisis Pregnancy Center campaign sounds great and topical. Have you identified your target audiences, how you will reach them, and how you will follow up with people interested in helping your campaign? Have you considered holding a rally and inviting speakers from organizations with which you might want to work in coalition?
We started the year with a public transit advocacy campaign. We tried to improve the level of service of our bus lines because they are notorious for simply not showing up when scheduled. That campaign ended a few months ago, long story, and we switched to tabling in public places up through the election. Our goal was to get more people comfortable talking about Socialism in public. It was kind of successful but hard to know since there were no measurable metrics for this kind of activity.
Are they going well?
Better than years past. We keep growing as a group and getting better at being effective. Still have a lot to learn and we have several flavors of “left” in the chapter that makes it hard to have a strong coherent stance on anything besides “Capitalism bad”… see this post. That’s the downside to being a “big tent” kind of organization.
Are they represented in this list? If not, why not?
These are all new campaign ideas. Part of this list is coming from comrades gaining more personal experience and doing more reading. I think the general consensus is we’re trying to find what we can realistically do and not just spin our wheels as a group.
Are there opportunities to grow or modify those campaigns?
Yes, after our last meeting we held a straw poll to see what projects people were most interested in seeing developed more before the final vote on what we pick in January. The Membership Development proposal got the most votes, while the other three were roughly even in votes. We’re working on merging the three proposals into one project (agitprop, mass line, and crisis pregnancy centers)
What worked well last year and what had room for improvement?
Our main project didn’t go so well, but we learned a lot of lessons from it! Be more proactive when forming coalitions, don’t just take people at their word, do your own outreach work, and don’t assume just because you are in front of news cameras that you will actually be covered. We had lots of camera time during our campaign and that translated into ZERO screen time on the local news. Now we know the corporate media, even local branches of it, are going to avoid us. We have to be our own media.
Are you working in any coalitions? If so, have you talked to them about strategic planning for the next year and identified any projects? If not, could you identify organizations with which you’d like to work in coalition?
Food Not Bombs is the big one, but there are others. I’m most proud that we made inroads with the local CPUSA branch (who aren’t in line with their national line), local PSL people, mutual aid groups, the local Maoists, etc. That work will hopefully continue next year and only continue to forge bonds across the community.
Do any of these proposed focuses have planning documents and committees? Timelines, bottom liners, budgets, goals? Any opportunities to help your members gain leadership and organizing skills?
All of these have timelines and need to have clear goals plus steps for running them. We learned that we need more planned out ahead of time because we can’t plan well “on the fly”. At the same time we need to be flexible and able to respond to changing conditions so I’m curious how this will play out next year.
Do you plan on recruiting? If so, what will “new recruits” do? Do you have a political education pipeline and people to lead it? How do you handle and/or minimize toxicity or harmful liberalism?
We need to figure this out. We have a “rose buddies” program where new members get paired with an experienced member to be their “buddy” for a few months, help them learn how to jump in, when the meetings are, etc. Most poli ed is needed at this stage for sure especially since we get a lot of recent ex-Democrats joining us.
Apologies for getting back to everyone a few days late. Since I put this post up we had another chapter meeting and there’s been some internal things I had to focus on. Organizing is fun…
I think political education is usually a good idea and even better if you can tie it to action of some kind. Can you think of a way in which a local project could be informed or framed by a Marxist perspective? Or maybe just ask that question during the reading session. The best way to prevent reading groups from only being reading groups is to use them to forward a practical goal.
I will forward this feedback on. Theory and Practice need to go hand-in-hand or else the lessons aren’t going to “stick.”
I think an agitprop program would be infinitely better if there were specific campaigns for which to make agitprop. The “agit” part of agitprop is for agitation. For what are you agitating and why? If this is something that someone has particular interest in I would not shoot them down, but I would help with grounding it in a campaign or two.
There are a lot of potential messaging campaigns in this proposal. One example:
Jesus Was A Socialist - Spread messages highlighting specific Bible passages to show Christians that Jesus would be aligned with us and not the Capitalist class. Co-opt the existing pro-Christianity messages that cover our city.
I would 100% scrap this. Instead, you should do research and practical projects in that part of town (which will also lead to insights) so that you can identify a better project. A mass line requires already being embedded with that population, knowing how to gain trust, having that trust, and pulling in a strategic direction. Do you have members from that part of town? Do they have strong community ties already? Think about how you could authentically create trust and ties. Think of reasons you should be present in that community and how you could support it. And rely on gathering real-world experience to answer that question.
“Think about how you could authentically create trust and ties” is the million dollar question for me. We’ve tried hard to do this and failed. I think a big part of it is our member demographics don’t match the class nor racial background of the people we are trying to organize. Basically, how do a bunch of college-educated white labor aristocrats make authentic connections to people who may not have the same education, be much poorer, and come from different minority groups?
A Crisis Pregnancy Center campaign sounds great and topical. Have you identified your target audiences, how you will reach them, and how you will follow up with people interested in helping your campaign? Have you considered holding a rally and inviting speakers from organizations with which you might want to work in coalition?
I like the rally idea. We have coalition partners that are much better at organizing rallies than us, but we can learn and do our own. I’m thinking this one is going to be merged into the agitprop proposal.
Take everything I say with a grain of salt because I don’t know much about your org or who is in it.
The first thing I would do is take a step back and ask why you are predetermining a year’s worth of organizing if it is not already more or less consensus. This might have the smell of being overly focused on committees and decisions when what is really needed is research, self-reflection, or just building a program organically.
I’m going to ask a bunch of questions. You don’t need to personally answer them by any means but they are the kinds of questions I would suggest thinking about.
Does your chapter already have any campaigns?
Are they going well?
Are they represented in this list? If not, why not?
Are there opportunities to grow or modify those campaigns?
What worked well last year and what had room for improvement?
Are you working in any coalitions? If so, have you talked to them about strategic planning for the next year and identified any projects? If not, could you identify organizations with which you’d like to work in coalition?
Do any of these proposed focuses have planning documents and committees? Timelines, bottom liners, budgets, goals? Any opportunities to help your members gain leadership and organizing skills?
Do you plan on recruiting? If so, what will “new recruits” do? Do you have a political education pipeline and people to lead it? How do you handle and/or minimize toxicity or harmful liberalism?
Okay so for the four listed items:
I think political education is usually a good idea and even better if you can tie it to action of some kind. Can you think of a way in which a local project could be informed or framed by a Marxist perspective? Or maybe just ask that question during the reading session. The best way to prevent reading groups from only being reading groups is to use them to forward a practical goal.
I think an agitprop program would be infinitely better if there were specific campaigns for which to make agitprop. The “agit” part of agitprop is for agitation. For what are you agitating and why? If this is something that someone has particular interest in I would not shoot them down, but I would help with grounding it in a campaign or two.
I would 100% scrap this. Instead, you should do research and practical projects in that part of town (which will also lead to insights) so that you can identify a better project. A mass line requires already being embedded with that population, knowing how to gain trust, having that trust, and pulling in a strategic direction. Do you have members from that part of town? Do they have strong community ties already? Think about how you could authentically create trust and ties. Think of reasons you should be present in that community and how you could support it. And rely on gathering real-world experience to answer that question.
A Crisis Pregnancy Center campaign sounds great and topical. Have you identified your target audiences, how you will reach them, and how you will follow up with people interested in helping your campaign? Have you considered holding a rally and inviting speakers from organizations with which you might want to work in coalition?
I hope this is helpful!
We started the year with a public transit advocacy campaign. We tried to improve the level of service of our bus lines because they are notorious for simply not showing up when scheduled. That campaign ended a few months ago, long story, and we switched to tabling in public places up through the election. Our goal was to get more people comfortable talking about Socialism in public. It was kind of successful but hard to know since there were no measurable metrics for this kind of activity.
Better than years past. We keep growing as a group and getting better at being effective. Still have a lot to learn and we have several flavors of “left” in the chapter that makes it hard to have a strong coherent stance on anything besides “Capitalism bad”… see this post. That’s the downside to being a “big tent” kind of organization.
These are all new campaign ideas. Part of this list is coming from comrades gaining more personal experience and doing more reading. I think the general consensus is we’re trying to find what we can realistically do and not just spin our wheels as a group.
Yes, after our last meeting we held a straw poll to see what projects people were most interested in seeing developed more before the final vote on what we pick in January. The Membership Development proposal got the most votes, while the other three were roughly even in votes. We’re working on merging the three proposals into one project (agitprop, mass line, and crisis pregnancy centers)
Our main project didn’t go so well, but we learned a lot of lessons from it! Be more proactive when forming coalitions, don’t just take people at their word, do your own outreach work, and don’t assume just because you are in front of news cameras that you will actually be covered. We had lots of camera time during our campaign and that translated into ZERO screen time on the local news. Now we know the corporate media, even local branches of it, are going to avoid us. We have to be our own media.
Food Not Bombs is the big one, but there are others. I’m most proud that we made inroads with the local CPUSA branch (who aren’t in line with their national line), local PSL people, mutual aid groups, the local Maoists, etc. That work will hopefully continue next year and only continue to forge bonds across the community.
All of these have timelines and need to have clear goals plus steps for running them. We learned that we need more planned out ahead of time because we can’t plan well “on the fly”. At the same time we need to be flexible and able to respond to changing conditions so I’m curious how this will play out next year.
We need to figure this out. We have a “rose buddies” program where new members get paired with an experienced member to be their “buddy” for a few months, help them learn how to jump in, when the meetings are, etc. Most poli ed is needed at this stage for sure especially since we get a lot of recent ex-Democrats joining us.
Apologies for getting back to everyone a few days late. Since I put this post up we had another chapter meeting and there’s been some internal things I had to focus on. Organizing is fun…
I will forward this feedback on. Theory and Practice need to go hand-in-hand or else the lessons aren’t going to “stick.”
There are a lot of potential messaging campaigns in this proposal. One example:
Jesus Was A Socialist - Spread messages highlighting specific Bible passages to show Christians that Jesus would be aligned with us and not the Capitalist class. Co-opt the existing pro-Christianity messages that cover our city.
“Think about how you could authentically create trust and ties” is the million dollar question for me. We’ve tried hard to do this and failed. I think a big part of it is our member demographics don’t match the class nor racial background of the people we are trying to organize. Basically, how do a bunch of college-educated white labor aristocrats make authentic connections to people who may not have the same education, be much poorer, and come from different minority groups?
I like the rally idea. We have coalition partners that are much better at organizing rallies than us, but we can learn and do our own. I’m thinking this one is going to be merged into the agitprop proposal.