• kescusay@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Are you saying RFA isn’t a branch of US interests? I have never heard anyone make that claim before.

    No, I’m saying that their reporting and fact-checking is credible.

    38north.org is a pretty decent source on North Korean news.

    Yes, it certainly appears to be.

    You have the burden of proof backwards: WHY would anyone believe that “hot dogs are banned in North Korea”. It simply makes no sense. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

    Because North Korea’s dictatorship has a well-documented history of atrocities and bizarre, freedom-limiting proclamations. Heck, it’s well-known for banning foods that it considers contrary to its culture, such as sushi, and it’s hard to imagine a more western food than hotdogs.

    There’s no reason to think the story is credible. I’ve searched it and it appears RFA posted it in November, then The Sun picked it up 3 days ago. Then various repeaters.

    And RFA is credible.

    • TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      a well-documented history of atrocities and bizarre, freedom-limiting proclamations… it’s well-known for banning foods that it considers contrary to its culture, such as sushi

      “well-documented”… then a link to worldpopulationreview.com without a mention of their source??

      You are coming across as someone who believes things they read on the internet.

      People have done a good job in the more upvoted comments of showing you why you’re jumping to conclusions, but you keep doubling down like you have something to prove.

      Here’s Vice saying many Pyongyang residents love sushi.