• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fair enough, I’m sure people DO criticize it but it’s mostly a joke.

    On a side note, are there any theoretical energy sources that DON’T involve steam? I’m not well-versed

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Solar (photovoltaics), wind turbines, and hydroelectric are a few non-steam energy sources in use.

      As for theoretical sources, some of the pulsed-power fusion concepts use the electromagnetic pulse from fusion to directly induce electrical power. But none of these have been demonstrated yet.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Excluding things that still involve moving fluid through a turbine or piston engine mechanically driving a dynamo or alternator while simply swapping out the steam for another fluid (too obvious), here’s all the ones I could find:

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Also not well versed, but last time I saw this topic come up, someone mentioned towers that wiggle in the wind and generate energy via the wiggles, apparently interacting with liquid at no point.

      edit: Also maybe this YouTuber’s creation? https://youtu.be/BSxK5VagSb8

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yup. There are reed-like wind capture devices that generate piezoelectricity from compression. The same technology is being implemented in some nations to capture pressure energy on roadways and paths.