alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agoU.S. investigates whether DeepSeek smuggled Nvidia AI GPUs via Singaporewww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down17cross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkU.S. investigates whether DeepSeek smuggled Nvidia AI GPUs via Singaporewww.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
minus-squareSpikesOtherDog@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI get the prevailing idea, and I can understand the reasoning behind it. My question really was trying to ferret out whether it was US laws that were violated, Singaporean laws, the initial trade agreement, or something else.
minus-squareNomecks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoThe seller and buyer both violated US export controls, which is against US law.
minus-squareBCsven@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoWhy does China care about US law though?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThe intermediaries care. This is very obvious.
minus-squareNomecks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThey don’t, but that wasn’t your question.
I get the prevailing idea, and I can understand the reasoning behind it. My question really was trying to ferret out whether it was US laws that were violated, Singaporean laws, the initial trade agreement, or something else.
The seller and buyer both violated US export controls, which is against US law.
Why does China care about US law though?
The intermediaries care. This is very obvious.
They don’t, but that wasn’t your question.