erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1841arrow-down112
arrow-up1829arrow-down1external-linkgender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·2 months agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.