• Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why were they laughing ? This is a perfectly reasonable chess implementation

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Typical snobbery.

      The Sinclair was rather ridiculed at the time as “not a real computer”.

      Nothing ever changes - Instead of being excited by someone having the skills to implement chess in 670k of memory by using freakin’ machine language, and appreciating the Sinclair for what it is, they compared to what they had.

      I mean wow, if you’ve never done machine language coding… I’m flabbergasted.

    • 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      It was great. I was 10. I needed to be able to win once in a while, and I did.

      They were laughing because they were early neckbeards. They probably had 16k of ram on their fancy BBC Micros.