Summary
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) responded to Elon Musk’s conspiracy theory that Democrats move the same group of paid protesters to different events.
Right-wing influencer Mario Nawfal claimed GPS data showed only 20,000 attendees—less than the reported 34,000—at recent rallies and suggested most had attended multiple past protests.
Musk amplified this claim, alleging the use of paid protesters.
Ocasio-Cortez dismissed Musk’s claim with “Someone’s butthurt,” adding he should find “a new, more interesting conspiracy theory to peddle.”
It’s amazing how consistent this is with fascists.
You can look back at their statements and it’s true like 86% of the time–every SINGLE THING they accuse others of doing is something that they, themselves are demonstrably engaged in.
When those people post on the internet, it really should just be a long line of regular people replying ‘Every accusation is a confession.’
@clonedhuman @BedSharkPal worth noting that those people have also spent their time since 2020 accusing Dems of rigging elections. Seems bizarre to me that nobody’s looked into it. All the swing states when he couldn’t fill a stadium? With the lowest approval rating of any president ever? With Elon paying people to send in their voter registration details? Yeah ok, let’s not check anything before special elections and midterms…
The exit polls seemed to line up with the results from what I remember. But yeah I struggle to believe that these individuals of all people didn’t fuck with the system.
Some people are calling for a forensic audit. And no, it’s not getting much press at all.
https://verifiedvoting.org/publication/recounts-audits-2024-verified-voting/
https://www.thecanary.co/global/world-analysis/2024/11/19/forensic-audit-us-presidential-election/
Wisconsin completed an audit recently and published the results: no errors.
https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-election-audit-trump-biden-2024-68d666a3e30ec4a904b1b6e33be311a6
Some articles that people post about Trump drop-off votes (where they only vote for Trump) being somehow suspicious are kind of stupid. Is it really hard to believe that many of his otherwise politically-disengaged cult members vote for him and then go home? Or that Democrats were not super enthusiastic about Harris’s moderate conservative campaign?
I suspect those still churning on the election results are the same that cheerfully swallowed the genocide pill and then lost.
So, yes. For some it is too hard to believe. It’s the easier option than contending with that reality.
yup. Some weird numbers. https://open.substack.com/pub/smartelections/p/so-clean
https://electiontruthalliance.org/clark-county%2C-nv
https://www.thenumbersarewrong2024.com/across-the-us/flipped-counties
https://youtube.com/shorts/ymDMBJIiMXc
It’s because they completely lack empathy. The entirety of possibilities in their minds is 100% limited to things that they themselves (and MAYBE close family) have experienced first hand.
They can’t help but project because they’re literally not creative enough to think of any other reason to do a thing besides the reason they did it.
Truth. There’s a reason why they don’t have any art, don’t have any music, don’t have any movies worth watching. They lack all creativity, are almost completely devoid of imagination, and their frontal lobes just consume energy without doing any frontal lobe things. It’s a very specific type of person who obeys like this, and they just mimic their leaders; if their leaders are shitty human beings, then they think they’ll rise in the hierarchy by being shitty as well.