@usenet 🌐 Usenet Providers Map 2025-02-23 Update

🔗 Interactive Map: https://usenet.rexum.space/tree
🔗 SVG: https://cdn.rexum.space/usenet/Usenet%20Providers%20and%20Backbones%20%28Version%202025-02-23%29.svg
🔗 Table: https://usenet.rexum.space/table

What’s New?
✅ Added real company names for clarity
✅ Removed Frugal Bonus (uncertain status)
✅ Streamlined info in the table

Thoughts? Errors? Let us know! Let’s keep Usenet open & accurate.

PS: New to Usenet? One backbone is usually enough—no pressure! 🔍

  • privadesco@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    It looks beautiful as it is, but do you consider adding the table data to the SVG itself so we can keep it all as a one-thing downloaded for offline reading in the future?

    Also, The table filtering features are really nice and help a lot, and I know it requires javascript for doing so, but would you consider maintaining a no-js copy of the full table without filters as an option?

    Anyways thanks for keeping this as is, already!

    • rexum@gnu.glOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      @privadesco yes but it’s always a hassle to update the svg and I made updating the website really easy. So I can always display the latest information there. A no js version does not really make sense for me but you can get the data as json from the api and do what ever you want with it. https://usenet.rexum.space/api/providers

      • privadesco@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Nice api! Thanks for the link!

        About the js, don’t get me wrong, the site looks gorgeous as it is (with the js)!

        It’s just for no-script users, the idea of having it rendering a simple nojs if the js can’t be loaded is always nice. But take that as niche feedback.

        About having it inside the SVG, well that is the only thing I miss from the old versions. It was a really nice way to visualize, specially offline. But I understand that the tree with the filters is far superior, and I thank you for that ;) .