Can’t deport you based on your speech (thankfully this isn’t vague at all) but can deport you for the crime of not having commited any crime.

deleted by creator

It’s always fun seeing someone grapple with “we have a long and storied juridical history of precedents” vs. “what if the state just does it” but this gets especially stupid considering the US runs on common law and once the first judge says all of that’s legal you get to colour change basically every square there and just throw the circles away

i would love to know exactly why the new york crimes, rag it may be, thanks that being deported without being convicted of a crime is more legal than deporting someone based on speech. because there is a subtle difference there, and it’s also entirely inappropriate to communicate that with a pithy graph in the paper of record. they’re just justifying slavery and neofascism

again if there’s no due process just throw this whole chart out because as it turns out your status as a citizen can change based on the whims of the agent and after they deport you “oops out of our jurisdiction now”. most americans don’t care unless it happens to someone they care about because they look white and “no one would deport a white person we belong here”

“Unlikely” aka yes but we will pretend like it’s a no

Trump should deport the New York Crimes to the bottom of the ocean

If something 100% happens, how is it “unlikely?” Or are they just going off of the statistical unlikelihood of each single individual reader being deported based on speech and having committed no crime?

Mahmoud Khalil

“Rights” that can be revoked whenever Trump feels like it lmao

Wow, not even twisting the facts. Just plain old lying.

At least the NYCrimes has a precedent.

deleted by creator

RACIsm chart

Data visualisation is my passion