no property damage, but didn’t some unarmed protester get shot by a “peacekeeper” at one of these for the crime of being near someone with a rifle the “peacekeeper” was shooting at? and there’s that other incident of the armed chud wandering into the crowd and menacing people brazenly his gun drawn, with no consequences?
liberals: property damage is bad, traumatizing and murdering people is NBD.
It was even worse than that. A leftist protestor and regular fixture at actually organising events was open carrying as they always did and was their legal right. Two ‘peacekeepers’ designated by the ‘protest’ organisers took it upon themselves to murder him in cold blood as he simply walked along the street, gun not raised, no intimidation etc (despite them lying about that until the video came out). He was hit and ran for his life and in their efforts to finish the job the ‘peacekeepers’ then shot another totally uninvolved protesting bystander. The organisers and ‘peacekeepers’ then conspired with the police to smear the victim of their attempted murder as a mass shooter and domestic terrorist, getting him slapped with a murder charge for the bystander they shot dead. They’ve only backed off this smear and attack narrative now that video has come out showing what actually happened. But orgnanisers are still refusing to acknowledge it, while protecting the identities of the ‘peacekeepers’, refusing to answer questions, and deleting or drowning out questions or criticism across their various online platforms.
no property damage, but didn’t some unarmed protester get shot by a “peacekeeper” at one of these for the crime of being near someone with a rifle the “peacekeeper” was shooting at? and there’s that other incident of the armed chud wandering into the crowd and menacing people brazenly his gun drawn, with no consequences?
liberals: property damage is bad, traumatizing and murdering people is NBD.
It was even worse than that. A leftist protestor and regular fixture at actually organising events was open carrying as they always did and was their legal right. Two ‘peacekeepers’ designated by the ‘protest’ organisers took it upon themselves to murder him in cold blood as he simply walked along the street, gun not raised, no intimidation etc (despite them lying about that until the video came out). He was hit and ran for his life and in their efforts to finish the job the ‘peacekeepers’ then shot another totally uninvolved protesting bystander. The organisers and ‘peacekeepers’ then conspired with the police to smear the victim of their attempted murder as a mass shooter and domestic terrorist, getting him slapped with a murder charge for the bystander they shot dead. They’ve only backed off this smear and attack narrative now that video has come out showing what actually happened. But orgnanisers are still refusing to acknowledge it, while protecting the identities of the ‘peacekeepers’, refusing to answer questions, and deleting or drowning out questions or criticism across their various online platforms.
I didn’t know there was a video.
They always make it so obvious that they value property damage over the lives of working class people, especially if they’re not white