Whatever side you pick I don’t think either of them intersects with “but its the reactionary capitalist western payment processors who get the final say actualy”.
nobody here is opposed to small time nsfw artists. they have an issue with corporate pimps and mass exploitation of vulnerable people and the SA factory that porn is
This isn’t about the porn industry’s working conditions, it’s about evangelical investors from the most reactionary parts of Amerika’s deep south using finance megacorporations as a tool for worldwide censorship that operates entirely on puritan ideology. Your reply directly plays into their PR strategy of using a group of SWERFs as a PR shield for that.
Sure is nice to see that the vulgar idea of “it’s not a real job unless you’re exhausted and covered in sweat and dirt/grease after a 12 hour shift” is still very present in some people here. I guess I should’ve stayed a chef until I died of alcohol poisoning because drinking daily was the only way to survive in that job, but at least it was “real work” according to this person. Fuck them, people can try to find enjoyment and joy in their jobs, even under capital, even if it means they don’t get to create exactly what they would like to and have to create what sells, it doesn’t make them petite bourgeois just because they aren’t destroying their body and their liver with their work.
There’s a weird puritan/SWERF streak on this site that’s managed to persist for a shockingly long time.
There’s a strong overlap with the posters who act really weird any time kink or poly relationships get brought up, and i’m fairly sure some of them have had previous accounts nuked for queerphobia in the past. The Venn diagram between TERFs and SWERFs is almost a circle for a reason.
That’s the ‘pro-porn’ view I thought. Weren’t there a bunch of people in previous threads who argued that all porn is anti-socialist deviance that should be banned?
deleted by creator
Whatever side you pick I don’t think either of them intersects with “but its the reactionary capitalist western payment processors who get the final say actualy”.
Pro-porn side seems to be winning so far!
nobody here is opposed to small time nsfw artists. they have an issue with corporate pimps and mass exploitation of vulnerable people and the SA factory that porn is
This isn’t about the porn industry’s working conditions, it’s about evangelical investors from the most reactionary parts of Amerika’s deep south using finance megacorporations as a tool for worldwide censorship that operates entirely on puritan ideology. Your reply directly plays into their PR strategy of using a group of SWERFs as a PR shield for that.
deleted by creator
Sure is nice to see that the vulgar idea of “it’s not a real job unless you’re exhausted and covered in sweat and dirt/grease after a 12 hour shift” is still very present in some people here. I guess I should’ve stayed a chef until I died of alcohol poisoning because drinking daily was the only way to survive in that job, but at least it was “real work” according to this person. Fuck them, people can try to find enjoyment and joy in their jobs, even under capital, even if it means they don’t get to create exactly what they would like to and have to create what sells, it doesn’t make them petite bourgeois just because they aren’t destroying their body and their liver with their work.
deleted by creator
There’s a strong overlap with the posters who act really weird any time kink or poly relationships get brought up, and i’m fairly sure some of them have had previous accounts nuked for queerphobia in the past. The Venn diagram between TERFs and SWERFs is almost a circle for a reason.
That’s the ‘pro-porn’ view I thought. Weren’t there a bunch of people in previous threads who argued that all porn is anti-socialist deviance that should be banned?
deleted by creator
Thanks. I didn’t want to drag up old pointless arguments, but I wondered if I was crazy.
Yeah I think basically no one would be morally opposed to nsfw drawings (besides… illegal… stuff… ofc).