• Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s not just that either. In a prequel, certain things have to happen, and certain things can’t happen. The Enterprise is never in danger of being destroyed, and the TOS crew can’t die or otherwise leave.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      That is so easily handled in a Sci Fi show. Particularly Star Trek, which has a long history of alternate timelines.

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s not really a prequel then though, they’re just using existing characters for their own story. At that point, write new characters too.

        • IWW4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I completely agree they should do new characters.

          As this is a green field of the unknown events of Kirk’s early career who is to say an alternate timeline that gets confidently wrapped up by dropping the crew back into the currently time is not what happened.

          All it takes is come creative writings to wrap all that up.

          • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            It could be good, and if it’s anything like Strange New Worlds it will be, but dropping them back to the main timeline still means that the bridge crew can’t die. There was an episode early on in Strange New Worlds where I think it was Spock, Uhura, and another crew member were in danger. We immediately knew that Spock and Uhura couldn’t die or be seriously injured, and it took a lot of the tension out of the episode, for me at least.