Opinion piece
I have honestly completely given up on streaming all together. It’s such a hassle. And looking for the thing that you want to watch always ends up the same way. It’s on another service that you’ve never heard of before and don’t pay for.
I watch the stuff I want to watch through other means. I don’t have enough money to give 15 bucks a month to every asshole who has enough money to hoard movies and TV shows rights.
I’m not sure if Disney could keep their mobile app working if their lives depended on it..
Browsing their recent reviews has a “1 star: please fix your shit” theme surprisingly often for an app published by a media giant.
I find it hard to imagine that the surprisingly frequent runs of 1-star “please fix your shit” reviews are balancing out to 4.4 star average without purchased bot account positive reviews.
It is staggering to watch unfold.
I cannot think of any previous example of such a large company utterly failing to attract the bare minimum talent needed to build and maintain the most fundamental part of their product.
Thank you for reading my Ted Talk. I don’t know what my point is, other than Disney has bought so much of their competitors that they feel they don’t even need to reliably deliver on their flagship product subscription.
A strange title for the article. Nothing in there suggests to me that Disney has “admitted Netflix won”, quite the opposite in fact. It is more aggressive and more competitive than ever.
Disney is fucking up by retiring the Hulu brand. They should’ve leaned into it as their bundle offering. Offered the channels a la carte under their own name (Disney, FX, ESPN), or as a Hulu bundle.
I despise the Hulu brand. It is the only streaming service I actually liked, and enjoyed the content of back in the day. But it constantly gave me tech issues. The last straw was when I googled an error code the web viewer gave me, and it said I need to update my video drivers. My computer was up to date and I cancelled. If I can’t watch anything why should I pay?
Hulu was the absolute shit back before they almost got shut down and had to start charging. It was basically Napster, but for streaming South Park.
Incidentally, what does this all mean for the KOTH continuation? It’s on Hulu, so do I need to tell people it’s on Disney now or something? I pirate so idk, but for recommending to other people they always ask “where at?”
You got greedy and fucked up. At first there was netflix. And it was fine because they had mostly everything.
Then someone decided to make their service and it was still fine because it was cheap and I could afford it in exchange of the good content.
Fast forward a few years and now there is one service for each show and people say: you know what? I’m not paying more than 100 to see all those streamings, I’ll stick with netflix that works and has enough for me.
Or just pirate everything. The resurgence in piracy has been astronomical because of the streaming wars. I’m loving that aspect.
To be fair, there’s also way more content being made now per year since Netflix became the (1) service and more-or-less only service.
A 100$?! Might as well go back to cable.
People gotta treat shows more they they do big budget video games. It’s expensive to buy all of them. Maybe you don’t need to buy all of them.
And piracy isn’t an answer to this question. Because then you are saying you have the right to all of them. Do you have a similar right to every video game? Every movie? Every song? Every written word?
This is just a personal opinion that I’m posting as a tangent to your comment about someone feeling burdened by the fact TV shows and movies are made by multiple different organizations. And they all choose their own paths to distribution.
Should we have laws that make studios distribute their content across multiple platforms? That at least is something that does not involve piracy. I’m not sure what precedent there is for that sort of thing. It sounds like people want competition between platforms. Not between studios. They want studios to distribute among platforms. And those platforms to compete on price. This actually sounds like how digital Gaming stores have played out. But they are not subscriptions. So the comparison breaks down there.
Do you have a similar right to every video game? Every movie? Every song? Every written word?
Yes, I have pirated games, movies, songs, books, articles, software, and technically even hardware (.stls of patented things exist). And I will continue.
And piracy isn’t an answer to this question. Because then you are saying you have the right to all of them. Do you have a similar right to every video game? Every movie? Every song? Every written word?
All media should enter the public domain after 10 years, so yeah, I do.
15 years, with a single optional extension that must be applied for in the 14th year. If you can’t manage to sell it in 30 years of marketing, you aren’t gonna sell it.
This is a bullshit number that you’ve pulled from thin air. Corporations would obviously go for the full 30 years, and by the time it’s getting close to 30 years, they’ll have figured out another loophole to withhold their content from the general population.
Corporations only exist to pull a profit. They do not care about consumers, only their profit margins, shareholders and quarterly turnaround. Dumb comment all round.
They did? Because they don’t have anything I really want to watch or must see anymore and the movie selection is pitiful. I suppose there is little money in old movies though, new content is where the bucks are.