Hello nerds 
hope you all have a good next week
Remember no crackers
Seeing chuds put pics of charlie with mlk saying “you don’t get silenced for the truth” when most of them don’t view us as human beings
I never wanna hear Westerners chat to us about propaganda
smh my head
Also, is it just me, or is that pic definitely AI-generated?
They did perform at a Super Bowl so maybe not, but it does have a bit of an AI luster to it. So maybe touched up by AI?
Speaking of AI though, I’m almost 100% the story itself is AI generated. No official sources confirming it. Also the whole article has that kind of writing quality that sounds like the type of shit an AI would generate.
I type 120 WPM, and I just found this transcriptionist job that I feel pretty damn hopeful about.
Most people online who describe their experience doing the job (even R*dditors) speak pretty positively about it, and I find that’s rare for these freelance kind of jobs.
They are also willing to do an over-the-phone interview (which I should get an email about in a bit, as I’ve just taken an assessment for them). I see this as a plus. Too many of these remote, freelancing kind of jobs would never actually let you connect with an actual person. They overall have an issue of lacking transparency big time.
The job also deals with legal and medical concerns, which are constantly in need of people to do transcriptions, so people have been saying that the job gives them plenty of work for it to be a full-time thing for them.
As expected, pay rate differs depending on how fast you type. It has been stated that someone who types 75 WPM should expect around 11 USD an hour, but someone who types 100 WPM should expect around 15 an hour. With my 120 WPM? Who knows?
I’m not getting my hopes up too much, though. Some people have stated negative things about this job, particularly tight deadlines and the fact that you may be dealing with emotionally intense stuff having to transcribe for legal and medical cases. However, for the point about the tight deadlines in particular, people have stated that if you have an absurdly fast typing speed (like I do), it’s far less of an issue.
I’m still applying to other jobs a whole lot, and I also got a few interviews to show up to next week, so that still goes on, but fingers crossed on this one for sure! 🤞🏿 The fact that it’s remote is also a major plus for me because I don’t drive, and I live in an area where it rains rather frequently.
If Kirk was at an HBCU he’d still be alive. This should tell them something but they’re too ignorant
Ngl the Kirk stuff did worry me some the other day because of the possible back lash but like if I have to monitor every
fit I would never get things done. Focusing on my HVAC career and the possibility finally of helping to lift my family out of poverty. I got goals and a future for when 
finally goes down
I gotta keep studying and get a job but I can’t help to think this might be learn to code advice. I don’t mind studying I really don’t and I love the material but without any material/structural change shit just keeps getting worse in america and best I can offer my friends and family is maybe try hvac. man fuck this dog shit country
Went to lunch with a friend today, it was nice until the topic of Charlie Kirk came up. I didn’t hold back my delight at his death and made clear that he deserved it. My friend immediately starts going on about how that makes me as bad as MAGA - an argument that I don’t engage with because it’s a stupid person argument - and how I’m radical, which I say “Yes!” to.
He’s recently been pivoting hard into Christianity and I know he spends a lot of time on Reddit, likely where he forms his political opinions. He tried to spin me a story about this Christian woman who forgave the killer of her children… after 3 days. He expected me to be impressed but I just found the idea of that absurd. How could anyone possibly do that? How could someone else hear that and think it’s something to emulate or be proud of? It’s just absurd.
I think he was trying to suggest people should forgive Charlie Kirk out of some Christian idealism - but no, why? I believe in second chances, but the man spouted evil up until the moment he died. He wasn’t sorry. This was his grift, this was his job.
I felt a bit bad for ripping the woman he mentioned to shreds so I apologised if I offended him, and he ‘joked’ “no, I know you’re just not very intelligent.” This irked me because he is just like everyone else, going along with the mainstream narrative, believing and saying what they’re being told to say about Charlie. Not using any critical thought. He’s gay too (but white passing) and yet he doesn’t see the threat that people like Charlie Kirk are to us. His solution to people advocating for the removal of our rights and our murder is to forgive them. And yet I’m the unintelligent one.
I don’t have respect for people like that. He will never contribute positively to liberation. He’s a citizen, he will happily live his life and be absorbed by his little problems, irrespective of what is happening around him, irrespective of the type of political climate he is living under - until it affects him. He’s my friend but equally people like that sicken me because they are the majority and their lack of attention to things that matter and their willingness to parrot what they’re told without critical thought is what enables all of this.
unsolicited sermon
Coming from another Christian, you didn’t really say anything wrong and his example isn’t appropriate. It’s one thing for someone to do something wrong to you and for you to forgive them (or decide to hold a grudge), it’s a different thing entirely to identify the oppressive dynamic happening to other people and situate yourself accordingly. If you hold any marginalized identity yourself, then there is a sense in which Kirk’s actions were harmful to you individually and, from your friend’s perspective, you would have to let go of that grudge to forgive him. But only thinking that way is a very liberal (and therefore the default in our bourgeois society) way to think; clearly our feelings about what happens on the news are a lot more about the societal forces at play, the contradictions in which we may identify an oppressor and the oppressed, are much bigger than our personal grievances about instances of harm we’ve been dealt. There’s a concept in Liberation Theology of collective sin, and it’s inherently tied to that distinction between the harm that individuals are capable of, versus the harm that entire systems may inflict.
Anyway, if I was there, I would interject when your friend said you weren’t very intelligent to say that the proposition that it’s a Christian’s task to forgive the collective sin committed by an entire society is misguided; at least, it’s a very 21st century neoliberal version of Christianity to think that when the TV/internet man dies you have to say a prayer for him and never speak ill of him or even feel negatively. The kind of forgiveness he’s talking about is fantastical and individualistic. It’s the negative peace which is the absence of tension which MLK Jr. spoke about. Actual forgiveness comes as the result of a whole community working to heal the wounds that were inflicted, that’s the mercy you’re supposed to show each other.
I somehow expected the shooter to be a chud, still wondering why no one said he was doing “adventurism” when we didn’t know his identity.
Woke up and had a voicemail for this missed call to set up an interview.
I called back to set up an interview, and that is one W, but another is that, even with my groggy, “just woke up” voice, the person on the phone called me “Miss.” That means my voice passes as femme at this point. Nice.
I was talking to my dad today sharing some good and very important family news.
Dad: I’m just a little sad right now, my friend was killed yesterday.
Me: Oh my God! What happened? Which friend?
D: My friend Charlie.
M: Charlie? Who’s Charlie?
D: Charlie Kirk.
M: PFFFFFFT LOL
Apparently we all lost a really intelligent man who just wanted to help other people. And he was not talking about the killer.
I was followed by a bunch of men telling me how good my pussy smelled, I don’t like going out.
“What if we used pickup lines from Silence of the Lambs?”
“Yeah! That totally won’t make us sound like serial killers!”
Silence of the Lambs?"
I think that movie is transphobic or ableist no?
Both, yes. Which is why you shouldn’t use it as a guide for harassing people.
Im so sorry, comrade. Im glad youre safe now
safe until I can leave my home again ig
Judas Priest - wth?
I love the hexbear logic of supporting and sharing aremoveds work is okay if you just kinda dont care about his victims
Wasn’t there a bunch of sexpests in the DSA a few years ago, as well? I know that one chapter had a speed dating event for party members. There’s definitely aremoved culture among the NATO-core left commonly overlooked.
There were also struggle sessions here a few months ago when reading The Will to Change by bell hooks. It was going through one ear and out the other for a lot of hexbears with he/him pronouns.
3 HBCU campuses on lockdown from death threats. White man kill white supremacists HBCU gets threatened. Most on brand American shit
But remember, Charlie didn’t deserve to die for his opinions which many a white supremacist also hold
Ayo funny thing is she is roasting the shit outta him. She became kinda based
Dang, thats wild. The libs can have a little credit, as a treat
Ok, that’s actually pretty damn good
Got another https://www.instagram.com/p/DOcuWYpjVmL/ Lmao how ppl rewriting it. Mfs were legit comparing him to mlk… Kirk literally insulted MLK☠️
The deontological imperative means you can’t wish death on people for holding opinions like Kirk’s. It causes too many logistical problems.
Hearing the blue genocide whites at my job talking about how evil it is to celebrate Kirk getting got
I’m at this point fully convinced that most white ass Americans all share to a degree, the same exact white supremacist views as Kirk did.
Even on this site there was some soul talm bout oh ryan reynolds just wants to find common ground with chuds. Its like what common ground? Everything the left in America hell several libs (seen chuds agree with it but keep being in denial) fight for… Benefits them too
healthcare, better work conditions etc.
Meanwhile these mfs fighting to strip civil rights of damn near every non rich white person. Like wtf do they even stand for? That kirk guy the right are crying for… Say civil rights act was a mistake. This is who many people say is the realest in a crazy world. I see why China has a great firewall tbhI love seeing the free speech absolutists squirming to celebrate a man who constantly advocated for taking away other people’s rights.
Shit I know europe ain’t having it easy but I imagine that several there along with lots of country in asia see their significantly better healtcare, education, life expectancy, food quality, lower gun deaths, SA numbers, infant mortality rates, housing rates, homeless rates, reproductive rights, upward mobility etc would give it all up for that 2nd Amendment.
. Even the euro vassals that are deteriorating got a long way to go befors reaching the levels and mandem braggin about paying for their lifestyle
I mean just look at this site of “leftists” when it comes to defending zionism
When were people here defending Zionism?
you missed the last struggle session then?
Haha guess so.
They can piss, moan, kick scream even off some leftists and libs. Charlie kirk is on the highway to hell and there is nothiiiiiiiing yoooooooooou can doooo about it
“They’re talking about this to distract from Trump being on the epstein list”<- white person who’s ignored the Palestinian genocide for 2 years
Sad no one at work brought it up yesterday so I could laugh. Then again a lot of my coworkers are based enough to have laughed and joked when Queen Elizabeth died, so I might have been pleasantly surprised by the reactions.
[CW: Racist, Zionist, and Misanthropic BS in the Vegan Movement]
There’s this awful right-wing “vegan” activist who’ll call himself a “centrist,” and he simps hard for Gary Yourofsky. His name is George. I’ll explain why this is relevant down the line.
For those of you who don’t know, Gary Yourofsky is considered to be one of the most influential vegan activists there is, having a very wide reach when it comes to his messaging. He retired for about a decade, but he recently came back.
The thing about Yourofsky is that he is a hardcore Zionist, and he’s one who claims to have “made 5% of Israel vegan,” but he has no actual data that supports this claim.
Since his return, Yourofsky has been doing interviews with several vegan YouTubers, creators, and activists, and recently, he did what he called his last one for the time being, a so-called “debate” with intersectional vegans Natalie Fulton and Catherine Klein. (CW)
Now, I watched this whole thing, and it’s honestly so damn embarrassing to watch. Gary got extreme levels of angry just because they challenged him on his Zionism. And by no means were they aggressive about this. They were incredibly polite and gentle with how they approached the subject with this man, certainly far more than I’d be, yet he just started lashing out, swearing, and saying contradictory back and forth things (e.g., on one hand, he’d say “Fuck all humans” and more generalized misanthropic platitudes, but then say something that praises Israelis in particular and denounces Palestinians in particular).
Regarding his “I turned 5% of Israel vegan” claim, Catherine responded by providing statistics stating that Israel is #8 in the world for meat consumption and #1 in the world for chicken consumption, emphasizing that the amount of chickens who die for Israeli food is a huge number especially because chickens are small individuals who get exploited in large quantities. She also noted that the claim that Israel is “the most vegan country in the world” has no sound evidence or empirical data. It’s actually a talking point pushed by this Israeli asshat who runs a large “vegan” organization.
And, of course, on top of all of this, Catherine noted that, even if Israel is this “vegan” (meaning “very plant-based” really) haven that Zionist “vegans” say it is, it doesn’t excuse genocide.
What baffles me the most about this whole stream is that Gary Yourofsky did a typical liberal move where he basically unknowingly blurted out “I love radical aesthetics but not actual radical politics!” By that, I mean he said that Malcolm X is one of his favorite figures in all of history. What the fuck.
This was all too much a fucking mess because Gary has such a huge fucking ego that he hates being challenged on anything ever.
So, now, back to the first sentence I made about George, this awful right-wing “vegan” activist who’ll call himself a centrist and simp for Gary Yourofsky. He made a video responding to this debate, and of course, in it, he was cucking for Gary really hard.
In his comments, someone said, “I’d feel more sympathy for Palestinians if they were vegan.”
George seemingly had no issue with that!
On this subject, I find it really odd when Zionist “vegans” say shit like this, as if Palestinians are especially non-vegan when compared to other groups of people, let alone the sheer disregard for their material conditions. Obviously, most people of any given country, culture, and ethnic group are going to be non-vegan, period. And yes, that quite clearly includes Pissraelis.
But in comes this hypocrisy: George has been whining a lot about Charlie KKKirKKK’s death on social media, and on a Facebook post he made today, he states:
You do not need to know who Charlie Kirk was.
You do not need to know what party he voted for.
You do not need to know what political opinions he had.
All you need to know is that a husband, and a father of 2 young children, was shot in the throat while engaging in peaceful debate on a Western country’s university campus, in 2025.
Note: I will be deleting ALL comments that just condemn him for what opinions he had or for subjectively being a “bad person”, in accordance with the very principle of this post.
LMAO, I love how he mentioned “On a Western country’s…” specifically. I should also note that this guy is big on some
shit.But besides him allegedly being a champion for “free speech,” here’s the crucial irony that exposes just how disingenuous this concerning trend of veganwashing Isn’trael’s genocide is: Charlie Kirk was firmly anti-vegan.
Ridiculousness all around.
The fact that people like this are too damn common in the “vegan” movement makes me so iffy about a lot of them. Certainly is a part of the reason why I took a big break from browsing the vegan side of social media.
Charlie Kirk: “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’” Shit you don’t have to worry about black pilots… Or any pilot again. Look at death laughing
look at itIf I see a white security guard at my speaking event, I’m going to be like, “Boy, I hope he’s qualified.”
Ayoooooo DUI security and DUI hesgeth.
