For example, mine is that I love watching Antiques Roadshow.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I have several joint damaging injuries. I’ve broken my ankle, torn the cartilage in my knee, and dislocated my shoulder fourteen times - and not only are those only the joint injuries, but only those that have required surgery.

      Last year, during a change of seasons, I was visiting a local diner for a takeout order and asked if they minded if I sat down to wait for my order, explaining that I was a damaged individual. They, of course, acquiesced, but then the owner of the venue asked if I noticed more pain during inclement weather.

      That was the first time over about thirty years of owies that I realized my pain might be correlated with barometric pressure.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Antiques Roadshow is absolutely amazing. It’s fascinating to see some of the old things people happen to have.

    Anyways, I’m at the point where I’m rewatching a bunch of old shows and cartoons I watched growing up, either through reruns or actually seeing. Mostly reruns, like how I’m currently on season 1 of The Golden Girls, a show I second hand absorbed to the point it’s one of my all time favorite live action shows period. I hope when I get old I can be a male version of Sophia.

    Also, I don’t need a “smart” TV. If it can handle HDMI cables, that’s good enough for me. I’ve been thinking if I ever have to upgrade monitors or get my own “smart” TV, that I’ll purposefully break warranty to crack it open to remove any form of camera/microphone and remove anything that allows the device to connect to the Internet, Wi-Fi, or cellular data, or whatever else there is.

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t know if they still make episodes of How It’s Made, but that show was amazing. Sure some things, like their episode on computers, are definitely outdated, but it’s still a cool thing to see regardless.

      • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 days ago

        Anything invented before you turn 15 is just how the world works.

        Anything invented between the ages of 15 and 30 is revolutionary and groundbreaking and you should pursue a career in it.

        Anything invented after you turn 30 goes against the natural order of things.

        • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          At 39, this is becoming more and more accurate to me as time goes on. I remember telling some kid trying to pitch me TikTok when it first came out: “They brought back Vines?”

          • WALLACE@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            I remember giving TikTok a go and getting frustrated because it kept showing me stupid videos of kids dancing and I couldn’t find a way of searching for specific topics and I ended up rage-uninstalling it.

            After I calmed down it dawned on me that the “stupid kids” dancing were actually around 18-20 years old and I couldn’t find what I wanted because I didn’t understand the UI.

        • datavoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think AI (aka LLMs) is / are against the natural order, I just think they are a terrible tool for work that requires thinking. And there are a lot of people, including medical professionals, who don’t care enough to verify what is presented to them. At least if I use AI generated code, I can test it.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, I use LLMs all the time for all sorts of things. Like, I’ll be working on a diy project and will think “I need a thing, and I know this thing exists, I just don’t know what it is called.” LLMs are great for that.

      • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I would think so. Given how obsessed people have become with AI and how pretty much everyone and their mother has ingrained themselves with AI. It’s harder to find someone who doesn’t use it at all than those who do. I hate it and everything that comes with it.

        • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          Gen Z here. I think you’d be surprised to find that gen z generally hates ai slop. Specifically the slop, most people are ok with some AI use.

          For llms It’s seen the same way I imagine search engines were (I was born after Google existed). People can just find an answer for their problem instead of searching for it in a book or asking someone. This can either be amazing for learning new things, or for cheating. My professors even tell me to USE ai to learn, just know how to actually use it to help learn rather than get the correct answer and be done with it.

  • cobysev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    I refuse to use TikTok, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc. I only have Facebook because 90% of my friends and family are there and it’s the primary way I stay in touch with them, but I’d like to get rid of that too.

    Regarding TikTok, I was serving in the US military as an IT sysadmin when it became popular. But we discovered that the app embedded itself deep in your phone’s hardware, granted itself full administrative access to your phone, then started trickling all your data to servers in China. And you couldn’t fully uninstall it once you’d installed it once. Your phone was completely compromised if you ever installed that app.

    It became a huge security risk and we were told to never use it. It was a horrifyingly effective spy tool China could use to easily collect data on us. That’s why President Biden pushed to ban TikTok in the US.

    But of course, TikTok became super popular among our civilian population and they refused to give it up, which led to a lot of pushback against the ban. It never held, and now people are still using it and sharing all their private information with China.

    Meta does something similar with Facebook/Instagram/Whatsapp, but we at least can keep tabs on what they’re doing with your private data, since they’re an American company. They mostly use your information to build advertising profiles on you, to better catch your attention with ads. But that information could easily be used against you if federal organizations wanted to. ICE could use it to identify non-white Americans and their daily habits and easily intercept them.

    Still, if you don’t want your private information being potentially stolen by these companies, it’s best to dump these programs. I don’t install them on my phone or tablet and I keep Facebook’s website isolated on my computer, since it likes to read other open windows and use those sites to fine-tune advertising data for you.

    Google has turned into one of these companies that collects data on everything you do, so I’m in the middle of de-Googling my life right now. But it’s really hard because they’re embedded everywhere.

    We’re living in a dark time where the only way to prevent corporations and governments from collecting information on you is to stay offline. Which is nearly impossible nowadays. We don’t get privacy in this modern Information Age. Not while Capitalism is still a thing.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      that’s gonna need to be sourced.

      is tiktok really exploiting phones to root them, then covertly installing itself “deep in your hardware”?

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        When you install TikTok, it fabricates its own independent SoC within your phone. Sometimes you can tell because the case bulges slightly, but it depends on the model.

        This isn’t strictly forbidden by Android and iOS APIs (yet), but there are limitations – this most notably affects the capacitors on the new SoC which degrade quickly and can make a faint clicking noise, hence the name “TikTok”.

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t know the veracity of the statements about tiktok, but I do remember a hubbub back in the day about facebook nestling into parts of your phone and not being uninstalled with the app. A quick search later, and it looks like it was because it was a ‘default app’ on samsung phones. So yeah, for this I definitely want to see the proof of concept and at least some relevant info on tiktok specifically.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          can confirm. my samsung phone has a “meta services” system app i had to root to yank out. they apparently had a deal to put that spyware in. i’m also not aware of a similar deal with tiktok.

    • AreaSIX @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Former military person, fear mongers about magic evil of TikTok tech mining everything and sending it to the scary Chinese, says that FB does the same but also claims that somehow “we at least can keep tabs on what they’re doing with your private data” (lol), while also admitting to still being on FB and using Google’s services. Not at all suspicious and incoherent I’d say.

      We discovered that the app embedded itself deep in your phone’s hardware, granted itself full administrative access to your phone, then started trickling all your data to servers in China

      Ok bud, that doesn’t sound stupid AF at all. This random military IT sysadmin knows this but all other cyber security experts in the world have somehow missed this crucial bit of info. And for some reason, this info hasn’t travelled up the chain through the intelligence agencies. Remarkable.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yep, I am like this too.

      How do you effectively promote spyware?

      Make it addictive like a drug, make it a core element of common culture, and most importantly, make it have some kind of socializing network effect that generates a knee jerk disgust in normies when anyone dares to question its widespread and regular use.

      It is extremely funny to me when someone asks me to install say discord or insta or whatsapp, and I say I don’t use them for security and privacy reasons…

      Then I ask them to install signal, and they say ‘I’m not going to install a whole app just for you.’

      Apparently entirely unaware of, oblivious that they literally just asked me to do that.

      whooooosh

      Then they get angry and begin to babble on about some kind of idiot nonsense about how either I don’t know how to do digital security or how its just impossible so why try, or both.

      If I mention that I literally did handle PII in corporate databases and thus do actually understand a decent chunk of cybersecurity…

      They tend to become emotional and defensive.

      Try to explain anything in detail to them and they have a bunch of sophomoric / dunning krueger instant retorts and thought terminating cliches, because they don’t want to listen or possibly learn anything, they want to justify their digital drug addiction.

      Oh well, works as an idiot filter for me.

      Suffer no fools.

  • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The streak of white in my beard?

    The fact that 75% of my media consumption is things I’ve already seen before?

    I can maintain eye contact in a conversation and at no point do I want to fuck/fight the other person nor do I believe they want to fuck/fight me?

    I can maintain friendships with people who do not share all of my views on things, with a select view even having opposing views?

    Comfort wins over style every time, with zero exceptions?

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m turning 50 soon, and almost all of this hits close to home. Almost all. My media consumption is as it’s always been: new books all the time. But also no TV, and I know all about a given movie from reading a few reviews, not actually watching it.

      • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Don’t get me wrong, I do enjoy a good read every now and again, but when I discovered indie films as a teenager I was hooked. Not to mention I was a classic “nerd” who liked comic books, Farscape, and BSG at a time before liking those things hit the mainstream.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m confused by the fuck/fight portion. Is it normal to want to fuck or fight every person who maintains eye contact? Have I been unknowingly threatening/coming into all of my work colleagues?

      • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        A lot of Zoomer/Alphagens have said in surveys that the perceive prolonged or maintained eye contact in a conversation as a sign of aggression or attraction. I was using hyperbolic language for brevity.

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Oh no. I worked so hard to be able to maintain eye contact in conversations (autistic) and now I’m questioning it.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Its almost like neurotypicals just think they know what ‘normal’ body language is, when in actuality they all disagree about almost all of it, each have their own plethora of weird quirks and ideas, and its just that they assume their standard is correct, because they hardly ever consciously, actively think about or analyze body language.

          • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Personally, maintaining eye contact during a conversation shows me that you’re actively paying attention and processing what I’m saying. I mean you might not actually be doing that, but I at least feel you are. And it’s a good sign. When I have some Alpha at work explain that bit about how their generation views that level of eye contact I audibly scoffed.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Yeah thats big ‘old man yells at clouds’ vibes.

              Its not me that could be wrong, no, its the children.

              Kids have different body language norms than me?

              Pff, that’s stupid, my illogical feelings and inaccurate, non-universal heuristics are what’s important here.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s a difference between respectlfully attentive eye contact (flits to other things occasionally, but refocuses), fighting eye contact (straight staring, tense facial expression), flirting eye contact (flits between eyes and lips, soft facial expression), and autistic eye contact (direct and unwavering eye contact that drills into your soul for seemingly no reason).

        Most likely, everyone just knows (at least implicitly) that you are autistic.

      • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sorry for the late reply, as others mentioned, either print at home, hotel, or at self check in kiosks at the airport. I’m irrationally paranoid about something happening to my phone whenever I need it for things beyond basic dumb phone use.

        The worldwide outage caused by the faulty security update (last year?) happened while I was in the air and nearly disrupted my trip. I was flying from Japan back to my mom’s hometown in Thailand and had one more connection in Bangkok. The gate attendants were only letting people on the connecting flight with printed boarding passes.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No rush. Thanks for taking the time.

          That global security update last year put out a whole bunch of services. It could just as easily been the paper versions that wouldn’t scan and the digital were the only ones accepted. Just luck.

          However, I can see the benefit for international flights with connections as your phone or device could easily lose power with long haul flying. Still pretty easy fix as most airports have power outlets everywhere for charging. But, if there was a flight delay landing, that would be a rush and extra stress.

          How many flights worldwide are there? It seems like an awful waste of paper, for what is effectively a barcode.

          • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Agreed on the waste factor. Alaska airlines started accepting electronic luggage tags that could be programmed by airlines to display the same information that goes on the paper ones. Somehow it doesn’t require a battery, and I’d hope it’s robust enough to handle getting tossed around. Something similar for boarding passes as well would be nice to have. Maybe provided by the airline and returned at your destination.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Lol, because printers is basically hunter gatherer territory. I just think printing digital information is wasteful. I don’t even see elderly people doing it any more. That’s why I’m curious. It seems harder, not easier these days.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s really easy for me to print something. One button. And then I don’t have to fight a spotty 4g connection to load a barcode.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              It’s really easy for me to save my boarding pass. One button. No paper James, no ink, no networking issues. Each method works fine, almost all the time. One just is more wasteful and easier to lose or damage.

              I’ve never been to an airport without wifi in the day of digital passes.

              • titter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 days ago

                Right, also, access your pass and screen shot it, then its in your camera roll and not locked away behind logins, networking, and data blackouts

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      This irritates the hell out of me, especially after those malicious link hijacks in the news recently. I’d accept a url before a qr code.

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I prefer an analog kitchen. Spring based scales, wooden utensils, gas stove, glass storage.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          If you can stick a magnet to your current cookware, no. :)

          Mine is all cast iron so I’m good, but aluminum or copper pans won’t work.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Cast iron and stainless both work fine. Glass not at all.

              Here’s what you can do if you want to experiment without jumping in with both feet like I did:

              https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07KSNTSVR

              You can get a single induction burner for a little more than $100.

              Do you make a lot of stuff that involves boiling water? Tea? Noodles? Other pasta? These things boil a pot of water in 2 minutes. Not kidding.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                Ohhh, that’s tempting, and probably sufficient for my needs! Thanks for the heads up.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Electric scale because it’s more accurate. Wooden utensils yes agreed, plastic from utensils does break down in your food especially while cooking, high temps. Electric stoves are a lot healthier than gas, for yourself in the kitchen and for the environment/climate. Electric stoves got soooo much better in the last 15 years. Other than nostalgia, I don’t see a reason to prefer gas nowadays. Glass for storage is the best, agreed.

      • everett@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        An electric kitchen scale is such a game-changer. If you convert ingredient volume into weight and something ends up being a fraction of a gram, especially when reducing a recipe, no big deal.

    • Alcyonaria@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Just a matter of quality imo, outside maybe gas, but gas is hard to unlearn. That is to say analog kitchens are nicer and easier to cook with imo

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    You mean, like, other than twice my age being statistically dead?

    Many.

    Let’s start with neo-Luddite tendencies, e.g. deep suspicion of, and wanting very little to do with: devices with planned obsolescence; devices that basically spy on the user; this push for LLMs and similar generative artificial “intelligence”.

    Or rather, the people who are pulling the strings, so to speak, behind those technologies. The technologies themselves have great potential, but that cannot be reached under those who presently control them.

    Also a strong dislike of people, usually kids, making noise or worse, actually being on my property because they have no respect for certain boundaries, or they don’t even know those boundaries exist. Classic “damn kids, get off my lawn” old man attitude.

    And finally: I still have a flip-phone and have no other computing devices beyond the one desktop PC I’m writing this comment from.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      And finally: I still have a flip-phone and have no other computing devices beyond the one desktop PC I’m writing

      That is hardcore. I respect it. Even my 86 year old mother has a smartphone.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I don’t download every new random chat app that’s in vogue. I’ll give you my phone number and we can text or talk without having to go through more 3rd parties besides the telephone companies we get service from. I hated needing a bajillion different text apps to talk to everyone I knew in the 2000s, I sure as hell ain’t gonna start that shit up again 25 years down the road. Unless someone makes something like Trillian, fuck off with your WeChats and WhatsApp and Velcro or whatever the fuck.

    • Gork@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d usually agree with this but SMS is pretty insecure, so I mainly use Signal instead for the end-to-end encryption in a responsible manner (no leaking war plans like a certain SecDef).

    • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Most of my friends don’t even have my phone number, let alone a messaging service. We do postal mail or just go to each other’s houses. I mail out about twenty letters a week and get that much back, on nice stationery.

      It’s good to feel loved.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s interesting because inside the US, this is a totally valid opinion to hold. Outside the US, many people end up having to pay per message, but can use data for free via WiFi, so it makes more sense that these apps are popular there.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It used to be pay per SMS (and not cheap either), that’s why WhatsApp got so big in the first place, it was “free” anywhere with free WiFi. But since many years now, regular SMS became free / dirt cheap (especially within EU), so it’s no longer as good as a reason to use WhatsApp now. Now it’s because it has groups, media, history, is searchable, etc.