This backpedal comes right after meeting with AOC and Bernie Sanders. The two have rubbed their shitlib off on him. Previously he seemed to not be totally for or against (could have generously been seen as “hiding his power level”) but now clearly against the phrase.

I still hope Zohran wins though. Him losing would be a big win for the pieces of shit in the media and in power looking to prove that even suggesting Israel might be doing something wrong is forbidden.

  • smokeppb [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Heaven forbid we have healthy discussion on this subject - Zohran and his backpedalling (and it is perceived as backpedalling, thats what matters in political campaigns) on radical rhetoric that he has himself used in the past. There are a lot of people sharing their thoughts which is understandable, but only you are pressing this idea that I am “shit stirring”.

    • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      and it is perceived as backpedalling, thats what matters in political campaigns

      “Backpedaling” on a fucking slogan literally does not matter at all, jesus christ, all I see is a bunch of nerds mad they’re not being dogwhistled to while refusing to admit that dogwhistles don’t matter

      Y’all act like if we chant “globalize the intifada” enough times it’s going to free Palestine

    • Maturin [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Zohran and his backpedalling (and it is perceived as backpedalling, thats what matters in political campaigns) on radical rhetoric that he has himself used in the past

      This is incorrect and it is the second time you have said it in this thread after being presented evidence that it is incorrect. It is consistent with what he said months ago and it is not “rhetoric that he has himself used in the past” as the article I pasted above clearly says.

      So, yes, you are shit stirring by trying to create a need for all this conflict in this thread based on false premises that you then double down on and get all defensive about. How are we supposed to have a “healthy discussion” based on your false premise?

      • smokeppb [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        And you lied multiple times saying there is nothing to discuss here, despite many other threads suggesting otherwise. I think it’s time you and I “disengage” as they say.

        • Maturin [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          and you lied multiple times

          Also false. “Disengage” has to be stand-alone, not at the end of a rant full of your own false statement. So here, you can disengage as you smoke this PIGPOOPBALLS