• millie@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wouldn’t blowing up a pipeline just be like, an ecological disaster? Or is this a pipeline that isn’t active yet?

  • Five@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 days ago

    Even the right-wing reviewers who hate the premise admit it’s a well written film in the vein of heist thrillers.

    It’s a really good movie. Not particularly useful if you actually want to destroy something - they were careful to get a consultant to make sure they didn’t break any laws or create liability for themselves or the studio. If you didn’t see it in theatre, you missed out! I’m really glad the feds are wringing their hooves over it, it deserved much better marketing. It is destined to become a cult classic.

      • Five@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        The beauty of it is – the people you go with don’t have to be ‘like-minded.’ You can enjoy Oceans Eleven without endorsing theft, you can enjoy HTBUAP without endorsing sabotage. If your friends feel it crosses a line, that’s a very interesting post-film discussion: Why isn’t it disturbing for people to root against the ‘house’ in Oceans? Is it okay to break the law to get rich, but not to do it for justice?

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 days ago

      But then a couple dozen bros can’t hoard wealth and power. It’s like you don’t even care about the capitalists. Bruh

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Those giant solar arrays where they focus all the energy up at one tower would be badass to blow up.

        Don’t do it, we desperately need more of those, but I imagine it would be sparkly.

    • sga@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      sadly, no - you still need high quality silica, and advanced facilities to manufacture the photovoltaics. Imagine it like you buying coal and using coal to power your house. yes this coal is cleaner, and runs for 10-20 years, but there are not many coal plants.

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        all power sources have the same problem of centralized sources of materials and manufacturing, so it doesn’t make solar any worse than the others

        but the other energy sources have the problem of centralization once they’re implemented

        • sga@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          this may seem stupid/naive, but geothermal does not have any such problem. it is effectively a ac (heat pump). Nuclear too does not require complex manufacturing. it still requires mining, but so do almost all electrical solutions too. but beyond that, they are just rocks that pretty much perpetually dissipiate heat. if you go for betavoltaics, they directly give electrons, and can charge stuff.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 days ago

    if the fascists hate the movie this badly it is probably good and everyone should watch it. i’m looking it up.

    • dillekant@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s a good movie, but like others have noted, this is not how you do it. 90% of blowing up a pipeline is community building, being able to get the gear you need and carry it out with a lot of people knowing and being able to trust that they won’t rat you out. But it turns out when you have a community like that, well, you don’t need to blow up the pipeline, you can just lobby the government.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m sure they’re less worried about the “hows” of it all, than just the promotion of the idea in popular thought.

        • dillekant@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, exactly this. The book by Andreas Malm had a review which read like “this book is less how to blow up a pipeline, and more why to blow up a pipeline”, and the movie is working on a metaphorical level to argue the case. You’re not meant to emulate it directly.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        when you have a community like that, well, you don’t need to blow up the pipeline, you can just lobby the government.

        I haven’t seen the movie yet; in which country is it set?

      • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lobbying is “begging for permission” from people who have been paid to not care. “Direct action gets the goods.”

        • dillekant@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Lobbying, protest, etc. These are effective. Money matters less than you think*. Often organising gets the job done.

          • The US is a weird case there, but in general this holds.
          • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well, lobbying in the US means “bribing” and if you’re just going to talk to them without money in hand they don’t give a fuck. Since the film is set in the US, that kind of matters. Lobbying against oil anywhere in the world is basically just ignored. Again, direct action gets the goods.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    I liked it. Not exactly a “how to” movie but a nice escape fantasy. The East has similar eco terrorism vibes but it tries to focus on too much and misses the mark. HTBUAP is dead on focused on destroying a pipeline and tells that story well.

  • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    Wow, I really hope no one writes “How to Blow Up a Fractionating Column With a $20 Drone.” Pipelines are pretty easy to mass produce, but attacks on distillation towers like we’ve seen come out of Ukraine can knock out a refinery for years.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    The producers of the movie: “Thank you for the free publicity! Now far more people will watch our movie than every would have otherwise.”