• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s fucked up.

    Cyclists should keep a nice, long screw in their bag. When someone parks like an asshole, no need to say anything, just prop the screw up under one of their tires and get on with your day.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s reusable and leaves essentially no evidence of tampering. Additionally, if the person cares about safety at all, they’ll stop the car immediately and the tire can be reused, but if they keep driving, it’s ruined.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      As someone who was yelled at for “parking in the bike lane” because I had a flat tire and that was the only place I could find to pull over …. Just assuming the worst and jumping right to violence is part of the problem, not the solution

      • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just a note here: Having mechanical issues with your vehicle (your private property) does not give you the right to break driving laws. A car with a flat is still capable of driving enough to move out of the way to a space that isn’t impeding traffic and/or putting others in danger.

        Granted, blocking a bike lane isn’t likely to put someone in immediate danger, but you are still blocking people from getting past so some amount of anger should be expected. Cyclists have to deal with so much crap being parked/dumped/littered in their bike lanes.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          blocking a bike lane isn’t likely to put someone in immediate danger

          If that were true, we wouldn’t need bike lanes in the first place

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          It may put bikers in danger though, because you force them to move out of the bike path into the car lane.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The danger it puts cyclists in is minimal. A bit of paint is not much protection, and cyclists cycle safely in the car lane on many roads.

            Making it about danger is hyperbolic.

            • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              A bit of paint is not much protection, and cyclists cycle safely in the car lane on many roads.

              Appeal to “trust me bro ive seen the numbers”

              • FishFace@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Didn’t expect to see “a painted cycle lane is significantly safer than no cycle lane” in this comm

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You can choose whichever you like but I’m more comfortable risking getting run over by one than the other

          Importantly this was in a city.

          • car traffic was constant
          • they had just gone down to one car lane to support a bus lane and bicycle lane - stopping in the car lane would have been out in the middle of everything and a much bigger obstruction I would have been standing in the bus lane to change my tire rather than the sidewalk
          • because of how busy, Nobody was going to be zooming by. cyclists were not at risk
      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        what part of your story justifies beating an innocent person unconcious?