The average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, according to a recent survey by Reviews.org, and that cycle is getting longer. The average was around 22 months in 2016.

While squeezing as much life out of your device as possible may save money in the short run, especially amid widespread fears about the strength of the consumer and job market, it might cost the economy in the long run, especially when device hoarding occurs at the level of corporations.

Research released by the Federal Reserve last month concludes that each additional year companies delay upgrading equipment results in a productivity decline of about one-third of a percent, with investment patterns accounting for approximately 55% of productivity gaps between advanced economies. The good news: businesses in the U.S. are generally quicker to reinvest in replacing aging equipment. The Federal Reserve report shows that if European productivity had matched U.S. investment patterns starting in 2000, the productivity gap between the U.S and European economic heavyweights would have been reduced by 29 percent for the U.K., 35 percent for France, and 101% for Germany.

  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reduce the amount of disposable income across the board, then start moaning that people arent buying shit they dont need as much… The utter fucking state of these people.

  • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Americans are increasingly opting for reusable cups. This is costing the plastic cup industry billions.

    And how exactly is this bad?

    Spending less money on stupid stuff isn’t hurting the economy, for fuck’s sake.

    The exact same applies to smartphones.

  • AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good. Better for your pocketbook, better for yourself, and better for the world.

    I would like to note that the difference in relative purchases of technology investments between consumer and business markets will make comparison a little less than easy.

    That and certain social demographics within the information technology world present a bleed through of practices in spending habits and thus should not be included.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the economy depends in us buying new phones every two years, then maybe the economy wasn’t as strong as we thought it was.

  • meathorse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I brought my s24 exactly because it’s got 7yrs of updates. I suspect it’ll need a new battery around 4yrs. If I’m lucky, that will let me hold out until Linux phones are more polished

  • Acamon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    244
    ·
    4 days ago

    The idea, that keeping a device for more than two years is “short term” thinking that could doom the economy, is a pretty damning indictment on the state of your economy.

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      More to the point that news item came from CNBC, itself a company that is 100% advertiser-supported.

      Of course they’re going to claim that people not buying is the doom of the economy.

      Their whole existence is tied to hyperconsumption, which, is becoming evident to even the marginally aware, of being no longer viable in the long run.

      Say after me: “Too bad, so sad…”

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not constantly throwing away things that are still good is “device hoarding” now? Strong “quiet quitting” vibes there.

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      That impressive really

      And i boast about my 2019 phone that still works fine.

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Who the fuck decided to predicate the economy on a <2-year upgrade cycle for electronics?! Tim Apple is that you?

  • 0ops@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    3 days ago

    Continuing to use something that still works is Hoarding? The shear fucking gall. They’re literally having to misuse the word “hoard” because they couldn’t think of a word for “sticking with something that works” with negative enough connotations.

    • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I know, right? That ridiculous usage of the word hoarding stuck out to me as well. While I know words can have different meanings in different contexts, I find it confounding that anybody would think that word applies to a person who is perfectly happy with their fully functional 2+ year old device and therefore does not compelled to buy a new replacement.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      the framing on it lmao

      “corporation device hoarding”

      you mean businesses keeping devices that they KNOW work instead of changing to devices with bullshit new issues created so more of your data can be harvested and you can be advertised to more?

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ve worked at large (5k+ workers) companies that were running Windows XP well into the late 2010’s, with matching hardware. That was too extreme (goddamn ie6).

        But this article makes me sick. If the economy needs people to throw away perfectly usable goods and buy new ones, the problem isn’t the people, it’s the fucking economy. It’s time to take a step back and rethink the system, because it’s gonna implode.

        • Thisiswritteningerman@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve got a machine running XP and one running 7. Both really only exist due to the software/equipment they’re supporting being abandoned. IT keeps them disconnected from everything else and generally doesn’t like that they exist. Disconnected Lab View licenses are fun though.