The SD card on my Echo Mini was full. I didn’t like the idea of navigating even more music on one device, so instead of a bigger SD card I just got another device.

This device isn’t perfect, but I can’t think of better alternative for my tastes except maybe an iPod. But those are crazy money to get upgraded to today’s standards (larger storage, lossless support, etc).

A new device, the Snowsky Echo (not mini) has been announced and also looks gorgeous. But I like the idea of having a few identical devices. I might get a third for meditations, audiobooks (despite the lack of chapter support) and ASMR.

    • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is an ~8,000 file limit anyway so a bigger card doesn’t solve everything. But I actually get decision paralysis having more music than that on one device so I’m happy to have a few of them. I might keep classical, instrumentals and soundtrack on one.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Do you know where yo find info about the upcoming device? I couldn’t find any info other than a random Facebook post not made by fiio

        The SEO is rough given its an existing popular product name, just minus a single descriptive term at the end 😅

        • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I know what you mean about the SEO problem. I don’t know where the info comes from originally. I saw a comment saying that they’re usually teased on Chinese social media and we get rumours based on that. r/snowsky gets teasers. All I have is this picture and internet speculation :)

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Gotcha, thanks!

            I think I’m leaning in the direction of an iPod, but thats more money and more of a project, so we’ll see :)

            • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              The iPod has never been surpassed. But if the price puts you off, the Innioasis Y1 looks interesting (although far from a 1:1 replacement). I douby the audio quality is as good, though.

              • Cris@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                I had no idea that existed, thanks for the additional option to consider! I’m kinda thinking about an iPod mini since those are also moddable, I think they look cute, and are a fair bit cheaper, but I think I might kinda miss color, higher resolution album art, at least a little bit

                5th gen kinda seems like the mid-teir price wise, but I’ve heard they’re not as stable with rockbox which Id be kinda interested in potentially running. And 6th gen or later seems really pricey

                • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It’s a tough choice. I like the nano for mobility and the larger classic for comfort if use. Then there’s the cost. I’d be going for Rockbox too for lossless support. The Y1 supports Rockbox.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I ended up getting both the player and the amp. They’re incredibly well made for the price and can handle output like a champ. I can highly recommend them.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yep! Also, the balanced output is super nice for driving beefier headphones, even when you’re not using wireless.

        • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh, that’s something I’m very curious about. I used wired Bose QC headphones with the 3.5mm port. Would getting balanced headphones for the other port be a noticeable upgrade in sound quality? Crazy to think this device might have more to offer.

          • otacon239@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Theoretically the improvement with balanced audio comes with the fact that the cone can push and pull the sound since you have positive and negative terminals for both left and right. It’s borderline snake oil, but the actual difference is that it can drive headphones more loudly with the same “level” of output. 50% volume on 3.5mm might sound closer to 75% volume on a balanced cable. These are not scientific numbers, but hopefully that makes sense.

            • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Thank you very much for that. I was able to do a bit more reading with that context. My headphone cable is on 1 meter long so I’m unlikely to notice an improvement in quality, especially at the low volume I listen at. But if I ever set up a stationary sound system at home I’ll get good headphones for running whatever distance I need.