Free online knowledge base displaced giants like Encyclopædia Britannica and Microsoft Encarta in the public psyche.

  • ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe “visits” would have been the better term, I don’t think a lot of babies visit Wikipedia every month.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am very grateful for Wikipedia, and I have donated to them several times. If you can, I suggest you do too. Wikipedia is a solid public good.

    • jeff@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Overall it’s true but there’s a lot of people pushing agendas on there too.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not only is that true, but Wikipedia’s resistance to bias (generally speaking) is definitely one of its strengths. even if it gets slammed with a bunch of revisionism for short periods, it will eventually self-correct.

        And, while I’m sure that many people could cite several exceptions to this, Wikipedia does, in a general sense, maintain these rather high standards regardless. Considering what Wikipedia is in the fact that it is free and always will be, the enduring value of it is obvious.