Heres a new one: Crime 101 is a 2026 crime thriller film starring Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Barry Keoghan, and Halle Berry. It is written and directed by Bart Layton, based on the 2020 novella of the same name by Don Winslow.

Big stars! How weird this has disappeared.

I haven’t read the plot so no spoilers, but I’m thinking it’s possible that there might be culturally or politically unsettling elements in this film. Remember: IDIOCRACY predicted our NOW and it was disappeared. ANNIVERSARY is our NOW and it was disappeared.

Crime 101 was released in January and I literally have never heard of it despite a great cast. What’s going on? Disappeared to protect the guilty?

  • Lets_Disco@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Big Cinema got to them of course!!!

    Umm yeah, thats right! Big Cinema only wants certain films to be promoted and available, so it releases films at the cinema and it might seem its the exact same treatment as other films. But if those films criticise ‘the guilty’, then it disappears them. I heard it sends the films to CIA black sites, never to be seen again.

    If I were you I wouldn’t wanna be caught up in such a serious conspiracy, what if Big Cinema gets to you for simply pulling the curtain aside?

    Definitely dont wanna get caught up in the ongoing, underground war between Big Streaming and Big Cinema!

    /s

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s barely any detail in there but regardless, “disappeared” is not accurate. Disappeared sounds like not only was it never released, we wouldn’t even really know about it.

        • wowwoweowza@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Details from the Wikipedia article:

          A number of critics connected the film’s reception to its unusual distribution and minimal promotion, which several reviews treated as part of the story of how it reached audiences.[d] Empire’sreviewer detailed Fox’s decision not to screen the film for critics and its sparse theatrical rollout, portraying this handling as a major reason the film was not widely seen at the time.[31]The Slate writer framed the release pattern as a form of institutional discomfort with the film’s targets, presenting the quiet rollout as consistent with a satire that attacks corporate and media power.[30] Film Threat’s reviewer likewise emphasized the limited release and lack of advertising, contrasting that treatment with what the review described as a genuinely funny film and interpreting the mismatch as evidence of tension between the filmmaker and the studio.[37] The Los Angeles Times and the Austin Chronicle both described the film as effectively dumped, with the latter suggesting that this kind of dismissive handling resembled the institutional stupidity that the film itself lampoons.[28][33]

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    IDIOCRACY predicted our NOW and it was disappeared.

    What do you mean with “disappeared”? You can stream it on Prime Video, Apple TV, Disney+, YouTube, and buy it on optical media.

  • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I saw Crime 101. It’s a good enough movie, but I wouldn’t say it has much in the way of political or social commentary, except some basic Robin Hood philosophy.

  • Chris@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are a lot of films at the cinema which only seem to be on for a week at most. Blink and you’ll miss them. I don’t think anybody’s intentionally “disappearing” anything; they just aren’t considered a big enough draw to show for any longer.

  • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    From the looks of it it’s a decent movie, well reviewed, audiences liked it, just not making much money. It happens, could be bad timing at the box office, movie fatigue, etc.

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve seen ads on Instagram for it. That, and Good Luck Have Fun Don’t Die (which imo looks pretty fun, even though I have no idea what it’s about).

    This (what your post is about) is a problem in that we all hate ads, so we go out of our way to not see any ads for anything. Then when new things come around, we’re frustrated that we had no idea this was coming. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy at this point, that we’re the reason for our discontent.

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      YouTube spams the fuck in my feed with Crime 101. I lost interest because of how much it was shoved down my throat.

      Not that I had much interest to begin with, but keep doing it and you make me do everything I can to avoid it and not want to look any deeper into it.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get that. I use Revanced, my phone’s DNS is set to “dns.adguard.com” and it blocks all ads (browser and mobile game/app ads), and on my PC I use Ublock.

        So maybe I’m one of the ones in my “problem.”

    • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, I don’t watch ads either, but I’ll see new releases on letterboxd, or my local independent theatre will play something new, like Marty Supreme, and I’ll hear about it that way.

      I find ads, regardless of their effectiveness in marketing, to be the least interesting way to find out about a film, because a well-made ad is more of an exception than the standard.

  • SkyeLight@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    My understanding was this was supposed to be a streaming film but the stars protested it should be in theaters, so it eventually got a theatrical release. Fitting it into existing commitments by the theaters may have contributed to it not lasting long in theaters.

  • lath@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    A lot of movies go unnoticed. Do you know of Night Patrol? I only saw a trailer by chance recently.
    We can’t pay attention to everything, that’s the main problem.