• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    For those annoyed with all these Spider-Man films, Sony is obligated to keep making them to avoid losing the film rights. They’re ruining the franchise one movie at a time for this crap. At this point they should just stop and avoid throwing more money away.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For all the people confused about this headline because of the runaway success of the last 5 spider-man films, they’re specifically talking about the spider-man-less spider-man universe films

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure it’s so Sony can:

      1. Keep as much spiderman out of Marvel’s hands
      2. Not have to pay much.

      I remember Sony had a contract that they have the rights to Spiderman, as long as they keep making movies with it.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    when they release this many, there’s too many for me to bother keeping up with, and I tune it out

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Make a remake of the Bollywood one. Keep Govinda as Superman. Use all the same effects, but boost the production value. Use the same choreography with floating head digi-doubles, animated by the Little Mermaid FX team.

    If you can get the budget over a billion dollars, I’d see it once in theaters.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I was confused because I thought the recent Spider-Man movies did really well, but apparently they’re counting Morbius, Madame Web, and Kraven the Hunter as part of the “Spider-Man universe”. Turns out “Spider-Man” movies without Spider-Man in them don’t tend to do well.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    AGAIN? In my lifetime now I have seen… god how many 4 separate spiderman reboots? This is literally the definition of insanity. Take. The hint. Sony, we are tired of superheroes. They’re fun, but god can you give it 2 years without doing a spiderman film?

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Now that I didn’t know, and explains a lot. That seems like either a very smart deal by marvel, and/or a very stupid deal by sony

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Sony made the deal in the late 1990s when Marvel was basically bankrupt. They didn’t predict that Disney would eventually own the whole thing and turn it into a behemoth.

          To be fair, the fact that it is now a behemoth is probably a factor in why Sony continues to throw money at it instead of letting the rights lapse. The more people Disney gets into Marvel, the more potential for better return on a Sony-made movie in the same universe. At least that’s probably what the execs think.

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        So our only hope is that they keep on making shit movies until they decide they’re only going to keep on losing money and hand it back to marvel

        Or… They could just revive the Spectacular Spiderman series, right? Everyone loved that show.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t know all the legal stuff, but my understanding is that use in shows is a separate license. Sony specifically owns the rights to live action feature length films.

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Sony, we are I am tired of superheroes.

      Ftfy

      I’m not tired of superheroes. I’m tired of the same superheroes being rebooted again and again, and then shitty, poorly written, poorly acted money grabs.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This right here. Nothing wrong with a Spider-Man movie, I’m looking forward to the next entry in the animated Spider Verse movies. Solid story telling that’s not rehashing hours origin story for the millionth time

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “You say, ‘$1.9 billion, what’s wrong with [saying] 2?’ Well, it didn’t get into China, but in my mind [the film’s box office is] over 2 [billion] because I know what we would have done in China.”

    These people need a fucking reality check, for a litany of reasons.