• Jay101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    But in Germany they still want more gas and oil. Because we have traitors as political leaders in govt.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every. Single. Thing. Ever. Happening. Since. 1973. Strengthens. The. Case. For. Renewables.

    (Except Harambe’s death. That was a galactic tragedy without implications for renewables.)

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not gonna sit here and let you say that Martin Scorsese’s masterpiece Goodfellas was a case for renewables. It wasn’t a case against them because it was a mob movie set mostly before 1973 but the point stands!

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You just wait until Scorsese releases Goodfellas 2 - then it will have proven to be renewable! 😀

  • dumnezero@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Get the car industry to fall in line. They’re the ones who keep the fossil fuel addiction going. Or go around them, go for public transit, rail, buses, and bicycles.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      More for the later myself. Though in the middle of the USA there’s still going to be vehicles and likely fossil fueled ones for a long time. We literally are still developing infrastructure for charging stations.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looking for O&G is looking for trouble. It’s always been the case. So avoid O&G as much as you can.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, because that’s not what DW used as headline.

      It’s a sign of their bias, yes, but removing it is “editing” the article in a sense.

      • optional@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not a sign of their bias (which might or might not exist), it’s just how we name wars: Vietnam War, Afghanistan War, Kosovo War, Ukraine War, Afghanistan war (again, this time with another aggressor, but still named after the attacked party)…

        Calling it “Israel War” would just be wrong, because neither is Israel the one who’s being attacked, nor are Israel’s girls elementary schools being turned into rubble.

        • einkorn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ok, that’s a good argument, however I’m throwing a new one into the ring myself: I think the “LocationX War” naming schema should not be used.

          Compare it to naming diseases after (supposed) places of origins such as the Spanish flue. In contrast, Coronavirus disease 2019 was explicitly named after the virus to avoid mixing cause and location. Which of course didn’t stop people like Trump to call it China flue anyway, but we digress …

          Partially this schema is used already. I.e. “The American War for Independence” is a war initiated by the people of the soon-to-be USA against their colonial sovereign Great Britain caused by a wish for independence. So IMO same as with diseases the name should derive from the cause, not from the location. Therefore, better alternatives to “the Iran war” are:

          • The war in Iran
          • The US-Israel war
          • The US-Israel war in Iran
          • The nuclear disarmament war (if you go by official US statements *cough cough*)
          • optional@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Therefore, better alternatives to “the Iran war” are:

            • The US-Israel war in Iran

            How about “US-Israel war with Iran”, which they already use. But in a headline you want to be short and concise. If you write “the Iran war” today, everyone knows which war you mean and who started it, there’s no need to repeat it in every headline. For the same reason they write about “renewables” instead of “renewable energies such as wind, water, biomass and solar power” and they write about “energy crisis” instead of “oil and oil-product supply crisis”. Because

            How the US-Israel war in Iran oil and oil product supply crisis caused by the blockage of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran in response to the US-Israeli attacks strengthens the case for renewable energies such as wind, water and biomass which some countries in Europe already produce a lot of

            is not a good headline.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Makes sense. DW is German and consuming to anything related to Israel in the mainstream German media landscape drives you insane very quickly. You think our press is stellar compared to most places but it‘s a bizzaro world when it comes to the near east. The lies and double think is unbearable.

        • Jay101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          What’s worse is all of it is supposed to be free from influence as it is paid individuals directly. But instead all Public media is Germany when talking about Israel, literally parrots Israeli govt propaganda, especially in German outlets.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nice, i would have complained if you only put Israel, because this is very much a US war. Without the US this war would have been over instantly.