I dunno the methodology seems weak to me.
They’re rugpulling people at question 13/15 by removing the AI they’d been tasked with using for the previous 12 questions. It would be like comparing athletes who’ve warmed up to athletes who are starting cold.
Not the only thing wrong but IMO the most blatant flaw with this study.
I find this whole topic to be weird… It’s kind of clear Ai is going to be a fundamental part of society and life like smartphones… It’s here to stay so if it makes you dumb in the traditional sense it doesn’t matter… Like writing cursive of using a the duo decimal system to look things up in an encyclopedia.
The bigger issue of Ai is it being produced and owned by the wrong people… Which it is. It’s already been raped, like cable tv, internet, etc… goodness is always bled out of things.
If people wanted things to be different they should have dismantles their governments decades ago. And since no one did that, we are all complicit.
You can’t participate in modern life and go to heaven.
They need to control against having to use Google or Bing to find that same answers in the inevitable SEO mire.